Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557888›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2018

Probabilistic Matching of Deidentified Data From a Trauma Registry and a Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Center: A Follow-up Validation Study.

Raj G Kumar, Zhensheng Wang, Matthew R Kesinger, Mark Newman, Toan T Huynh, Janet P Niemeier, Jason L Sperry, Amy K Wagner

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raj G KumarFrom the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (RGK, ZW, AKW); Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (RGK, ZW); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Carolinas Rehabilitation, Charlotte, North Carolina (MN, JPN); Acute Care Trauma Surgery, Carolinas Healthcare, Charlotte, North Carolina (TTH); Department of Trauma, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (MRK, JLS); Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (AKW); Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (AKW); and Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (AKW).
Zhensheng Wang
Matthew R Kesinger
Mark Newman
Toan T Huynh
Janet P Niemeier
Jason L Sperry
Amy K Wagner

Funding

Characterization of the Mechanisms Responsible for Sex Based Outcome Difference FK23GM093032 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SPERRY, JASON LEE · 2010 to 2014
$597k
Evaluating Casual and Inferential Association Across the Clinical Care Spectrum Between Extra-Cranial Injury and Suicidality After Moderate to Severe TBIR21HD089075 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WAGNER, AMY K · 2016 to 2017
$438k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD089075NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM093032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a previous study, individuals from a single Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems and trauma center were matched using a novel probabilistic matching algorithm. The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems is a multicenter prospective cohort study containing more than 14,000 participants with traumatic brain injury, following them from inpatient rehabilitation to the community over the remainder of their lifetime. The National Trauma Databank is the largest aggregation of trauma data in the United States, including more than 6 million records. Linking these two databases offers a broad range of opportunities to explore research questions not otherwise possible. Our objective was to refine and validate the previous protocol at another independent center. An algorithm generation and validation data set were created, and potential matches were blocked by age, sex, and year of injury; total probabilistic weight was calculated based on of 12 common data fields. Validity metrics were calculated using a minimum probabilistic weight of 3. The positive predictive value was 98.2% and 97.4% and sensitivity was 74.1% and 76.3%, in the algorithm generation and validation set, respectively. These metrics were similar to the previous study. Future work will apply the refined probabilistic matching algorithm to the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems and the National Trauma Databank to generate a merged data set for clinical traumatic brain injury research use.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain Injuries, TraumaticModels, StatisticalTrauma Severity IndicesAdolescentAdultData AnonymizationDatabases, FactualDatasets as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29557888
PMCPMC5863735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.