Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557782›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

A spike sorting toolbox for up to thousands of electrodes validated with ground truth recordings in vitro and in vivo.

Pierre Yger, Giulia Lb Spampinato, Elric Esposito, Baptiste Lefebvre, Stéphane Deny, Christophe Gardella, Marcel Stimberg, Florian Jetter, Guenther Zeck, Serge Picaud and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On variability in local field potentials.Communications biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. KIASORT: Knowledge-Integrated Automated Spike Sorting for Geometry-Free Neuron Tracking.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An integratediScience · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microglia Modulate Information Processing in the Mouse Barrel Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pierre Yger *Institut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-5240
Giulia Lb Spampinato *Institut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.
Elric Esposito *Institut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.
Baptiste LefebvreInstitut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.
Stéphane DenyInstitut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.
Christophe GardellaInstitut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-9012
Marcel StimbergInstitut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-4790
Florian JetterNMI, Neurophysics Group, Reutlingen, Germany.
Guenther ZeckNMI, Neurophysics Group, Reutlingen, Germany.
Serge PicaudInstitut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.
Jens DuebelInstitut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.
Olivier MarreInstitut de la Vision, INSERM UMRS 968, UPMC UM 80, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0090-6190

Funding

Three Dimensional Holography for Parallel Multi-target Optogenetic Circuit ManipulationU01NS090501 · NINDS · PIERRE AND MARIE CURIE UNIVERSITY · PI EMILIANI, VALENTINA, PICAUD, SERGE · 2014 to 2016
$941k
European Research Council 309776European Research Council ERC StG 309776NIH HHS U01NS090501NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, multielectrode arrays and large silicon probes have been developed to record simultaneously between hundreds and thousands of electrodes packed with a high density. However, they require novel methods to extract the spiking activity of large ensembles of neurons. Here, we developed a new toolbox to sort spikes from these large-scale extracellular data. To validate our method, we performed simultaneous extracellular and loose patch recordings in rodents to obtain 'ground truth' data, where the solution to this sorting problem is known for one cell. The performance of our algorithm was always close to the best expected performance, over a broad range of signal-to-noise ratios, in vitro and in vivo. The algorithm is entirely parallelized and has been successfully tested on recordings with up to 4225 electrodes. Our toolbox thus offers a generic solution to sort accurately spikes for up to thousands of electrodes.

Indexed as

ElectrodesAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationElectrophysiologyMaleMiceModels, NeurologicalRats, Long-EvansRetinal NeuronsSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedelectrophysiologymouseneural ensembleneurosciencepopulation recordingratsilicon probespike sorting

Identifiers

PMID29557782
PMCPMC5897014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.