Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557540›Full record

ReviewAIDS and behavior2018

An Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model of PrEP Uptake.

Alex Dubov, Frederick L Altice, Liana Fraenkel

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05243030 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Adapting Effective mHealth Interventions to Improve Uptake and Adherence of the HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Thai Young Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2022 to 2025Enrolled119ConditionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisArmsMotivational Enhancement System for PrEP Uptake and Adherence (MES-PrEP), Motivational Interactive Text Messaging (MTM), Standard PrEP Counseling
NCT05262426 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing an mHealth Intervention to Improve Uptake and Adherence of the HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Vulnerable Adolescents and Emerging Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2021 to 2026Enrolled145ConditionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisArmsBehavioral: Motivational Enhancement System for PrEP Uptake and Adherence (MES-PrEP), Enhanced YaCool, Standard PrEP Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Women's Decision-Making about PrEP for HIV Prevention in Drug Treatment Contexts.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alex DubovLoma Linda University School of Public Health, Sanitarium Dr., Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-0254
Frederick L AlticeDepartment of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Infectious Diseases, AIDS Program, Yale University School of Medicine, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT, 06510-2283, USA.
Liana FraenkelDepartment of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208031, 300 Cedar Street, TAC Bldg., New Haven, CT, 06520-8031, USA. liana.fraenkel@yale.edu.
Yale University · USLoma Linda University · US

Funding

Enhancing Health Outcomes Among HIV+ Substance AbusersK24DA017072 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ALTICE, FREDERICK LEWIS · 2003 to 2012
$1.5M
Improving Decision Making in Patients with Rheumatic DiseaseK24AR060231 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRAENKEL, LIANA · 2011 to 2018
$1.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR060231NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR060231NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA017072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite documented effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP uptake remains low among at-risk populations. The 2015 CDC report estimates that about 1.2 million people in the US have indications for PrEP. However, only 49,158 or 4% of the targeted population are currently using PrEP. Efforts to optimize uptake of PrEP may be facilitated by the development of a comprehensive theoretical framework which can be used to understand reasons for poor uptake and to develop interventions to maximize PrEP uptake and adherence. This article reviews research on correlates of PrEP uptake and presents findings organized within an Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model framework. In the context of PrEP uptake, the IMB model asserts that to the extent that at-risk groups are well-informed about PrEP, motivated to act on their knowledge, and have necessary behavioral skills to seek out and initiate PrEP regimen, they will successfully overcome obstacles to initiate and adhere to PrEP. The article proposes an adaptation the IMB model for PrEP uptake, provides empirical support for the adapted IMB model extracted from related research, and discusses its application in PrEP uptake interventions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMotivationPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSelf EfficacyAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareVulnerable PopulationsCorrelates of PrEP initiationInformation–motivation–behavioral skills modelPre-exposure prophylaxisPrEP uptake

Identifiers

PMID29557540
PMCPMC9626245
OpenAlexW2792281261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.