Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557509›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2018

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a Dog Bone button fixation alone versus Dog Bone button fixation augmented with acromioclavicular repair-a finite element analysis study.

Sermsak Sumanont, Supachoke Nopamassiri, Artit Boonrod, Punyawat Apiwatanakul, Arunnit Boonrod, Chanakarn Phornphutkul

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05844098 (Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury, A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05844098 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury, A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, ThailandRan2024 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsAcromioclavicular Joint DislocationArmsK-wire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sermsak SumanontDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Supachoke NopamassiriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kalasin Hospital, Kalasin, Thailand.
Artit BoonrodDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. artibo@kku.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-243X
Punyawat ApiwatanakulDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
Arunnit BoonrodDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chanakarn PhornphutkulDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Khon Kaen University · THChiang Mai University · THKalasin University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuspension suture button fixation was frequently used to treat acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. However, there were many studies reporting about complications and residual horizontal instability after fixation. Our study compared the stability of ACJ after fixation between coracoclavicular (CC) fixation alone and CC fixation combined with ACJ repair by using finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND

methodsA finite element model was created by using CT images from the normal shoulder. The model 1 was CC fixation with suture button alone, and the model 2 was CC fixation with suture button combined with ACJ repair. Three different forces (50, 100, 200 N) applied to the model in three planes; inferior, anterior and posterior direction load to the acromion. The von Mises stress of the implants and deformation at ACJs was recorded.

resultsThe ACJ repair in the model 2 could reduce the peak stress on the implant after applying the loading forces to the acromion which the ACJ repair could reduce the peak stress of the FiberWire at suture button about 90% when compared to model 1. And, the ACJ repair could reduce the deformation of the ACJ after applying the loading forces to the acromion in both vertical and horizontal planes.

conclusionThis FEA supports that the high-grade injuries of the ACJ should be treated with CC fixation combined with ACJ repair because this technique provides excellent stability in both vertical and horizontal planes and reduces stress to the suture button.

Indexed as

Acromioclavicular JointBone WiresComputer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisHumansJoint DislocationsOrthopedic ProceduresScapulaSuture AnchorsSuture TechniquesAcromioclavicular joint dislocationAcromioclavicular joint repairFinite element analysisSuture button fixation

Identifiers

PMID29557509
OpenAlexW2790995980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.