Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557365›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2018

Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease.

María Díez-Cirarda, Naroa Ibarretxe-Bilbao, Javier Peña, Natalia Ojeda

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04955275 (The Efficacy of a Remote Cognitive Remediation Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04955275 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of a Remote Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) Program on Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York Institute of TechnologyRan2021 to 2022Enrolled25ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsCognitive Remediation Therapy Program (BrainHQ)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Díez-CirardaDepartment of Methods and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
Naroa Ibarretxe-BilbaoDepartment of Methods and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
Javier PeñaDepartment of Methods and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
Natalia OjedaDepartment of Methods and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
Universidad de Deusto · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID29557365
PMCPMC5879887
OpenAlexW2792434183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.