Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557196›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology2019

The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers.

Brad E Dicianno, James Joseph, Stacy Eckstein, Christina K Zigler, Eleanor J Quinby, Mark R Schmeler, Richard M Schein, Jon Pearlman, Rory A Cooper

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07221552 (Development and Evaluation of PPAL Bedside Commode for Safe Independent Toileting Transfers), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07221552 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of PPAL Bedside Commode for Safe Independent Toileting Transfers

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlicia KoontzRan2026 to 2026Enrolled16ConditionsAge ProblemsArmsPPAL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Customization of manual wheelchair components: a state-of-the-art review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brad E Diciannoa Human Engineering Research Laboratories , VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
James Josepha Human Engineering Research Laboratories , VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Stacy Ecksteina Human Engineering Research Laboratories , VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Christina K Ziglera Human Engineering Research Laboratories , VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Eleanor J Quinbyb Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Mark R Schmelerc Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology , University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Richard M Scheinc Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology , University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Jon Pearlmana Human Engineering Research Laboratories , VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
Rory A Coopera Human Engineering Research Laboratories , VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the opinions of providers of mobility assistive technologies to help inform a research agenda and set priorities. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis survey study was anonymous and gathered opinions of individuals who participate in the process to provide wheelchairs and other assistive technologies to clients. Participants were asked to rank the importance of developing various technologies and rank items against each other in terms of order of importance. Participants were also asked to respond to several open-ended questions or statements.

resultsA total of 161 providers from 35 states within the USA consented to participation and completed the survey.

conclusionsThis survey revealed themes of advanced wheelchair design, assistive robotics and intelligent systems, human machine interfaces and smart device applications. It also outlined priorities for researchers to provide continuing education to clients and providers. These themes will be used to develop research and development priorities. Implications for Rehabilitation • Research in advanced wheelchair design is needed to facilitate travel and environmental access with wheelchairs and to develop alternative power sources for wheelchairs.• New assistive robotics and intelligent systems are needed to help wheelchairs overcome obstacles or self-adjust, assist wheelchair navigation in the community, assist caregivers and transfers, and aid ambulation.• Innovations in human machine interfaces may help advance the control of mobility devices and robots with the brain, eye movements, facial gesture recognition or other systems.• Development of new smart devices is needed for better control of the environment, monitoring activity and promoting healthy behaviours.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEquipment DesignMobility LimitationRoboticsSelf-Help DevicesWheelchairsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDisabilitymobilityrehabilitationroboticstherapywheelchair

Identifiers

PMID29557196
PMCPMC6168437
OpenAlexW2794129179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.