Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557066›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2018

Human latent inhibition: Problems with the stimulus exposure effect.

N C Byrom, R M Msetfi, R A Murphy

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Latent Inhibition in Schizophrenia and Schizotypy.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Behavioral and neural mechanisms of latent inhibition.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

N C ByromDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, Guy's Campus, Kings College London, London, UK. Nicola.byrom@kcl.ac.uk.
R M MsetfiCentre for Social Issues Research, Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
R A MurphyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, England.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Limerick · IEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) is a startlingly simple effect in which preexposure of a stimulus without consequence retards subsequent responding to a stimulus-consequence relation. The effect was first demonstrated with Pavlovian conditioning in animals and was later suggested to be a marker of human psychopathology such as schizophrenia. Individual differences in LI has supported the continued use of animal models to understand human mental health. In this review, we ask whether there is sufficient evidence to support the continued application of LI from animal models to human psychopathology because of the weak evidence for LI in humans. There is considerable variability in the methods used to assess LI, sustaining different theoretical accounts of the effects observed, which differ from the accepted accounts of LI as demonstrated in animals. The review shows that although there have been many experiments testing human LI, none provide the necessary experimental controls to support the conclusion that retarded responding is caused simply by preexposure to a stimulus, as has been demonstrated with animal models. Establishing this conflict, we set out a framework for future research.

Indexed as

Association LearningConditioning, ClassicalInhibition, PsychologicalModels, AnimalAdultAnimalsAttentionCuesHumansMaleMental RecallPerceptual MaskingReaction TimeAssociative learningLatent inhibitionMasking tasksPriming

Identifiers

PMID29557066
PMCPMC6267522
OpenAlexW2793748962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.