Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29557062›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2018

Beyond Compliance Checking: A Situated Approach to Visual Research Ethics.

Caroline Lenette, Jessica R Botfield, Katherine Boydell, Bridget Haire, Christy E Newman, Anthony B Zwi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 'Consider a Less Risky Alternative': Navigating Ethics Approval in Suicide Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline LenetteForced Migration Research Network (FMRN@UNSW), School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. c.lenette@unsw.edu.au.
Jessica R BotfieldHealth, Rights and Development (HEARD@UNSW), School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Katherine BoydellBlack Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Bridget HaireThe Kirby Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Christy E NewmanCentre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Anthony B ZwiHealth, Rights and Development (HEARD@UNSW), School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual research methods like photography and digital storytelling are increasingly used in health and social sciences research as participatory approaches that benefit participants, researchers, and audiences. Visual methods involve a number of additional ethical considerations such as using identifiable content and ownership of creative outputs. As such, ethics committees should use different assessment frameworks to consider research protocols with visual methods. Here, we outline the limitations of ethics committees in assessing projects with a visual focus and highlight the sparse knowledge on how researchers respond when they encounter ethical challenges in the practice of visual research. We propose a situated approach in relation to visual methodologies that encompasses a negotiated, flexible approach, given that ethical issues usually emerge in relation to the specific contexts of individual research projects. Drawing on available literature and two case studies, we identify and reflect on nuanced ethical implications in visual research, like tensions between aesthetics and research validity. The case studies highlight strategies developed in-situ to address the challenges two researchers encountered when using visual research methods, illustrating that some practice implications are not necessarily addressed using established ethical clearance procedures. A situated approach can ensure that visual research remains ethical, engaging, and rigorous.

Indexed as

Ethical AnalysisEthics, ResearchNarrationResearch DesignCommunicationConfidentialityCreativityElectronicsEstheticsEthics Committees, ResearchHumansInformed ConsentOwnershipPhotographyVision, OcularAustraliaEthical reviewEthics in practiceReflexivityVisual-based research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.