Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556981›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Behavioral and Neural Evidence of the Rewarding Value of Exercise Behaviors: A Systematic Review.

Boris Cheval, Rémi Radel, Jason L Neva, Lara A Boyd, Stephan P Swinnen, David Sander, Matthieu P Boisgontier

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05704660 (Retraining the Automatic Reaction to Physical Activity and Sedentary Stimuli in Adults 60 Years of Age or Older), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05704660 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Retraining the Automatic Reaction to Physical Activity and Sedentary Stimuli in Adults 60 Years of Age or Older

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled216ConditionsAgingArmsAdjusted Cognitive-biased modification task, Cognitive-biased modification task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Boris ChevalSwiss NCCR "LIVES, Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives", University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rémi RadelLaboratoire Motricité Humaine Expertise Sport Santé (LAMHESS), Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Jason L NevaBrain Behavior Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lara A BoydBrain Behavior Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Stephan P SwinnenMovement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
David SanderSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Matthieu P BoisgontierBrain Behavior Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. matthieu.boisgontier@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9376-3071

Funding

Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) 1501018NResearch Foundation-Flanders (FWO) 1504015N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a time of physical inactivity pandemic, attempts to better understand the factors underlying the regulation of exercise behavior are important. The dominant neurobiological approach to exercise behavior considers physical activity to be a reward; however, negative affective responses during exercise challenge this idea.

objectiveOur objective was to systematically review studies testing the automatic reactions triggered by stimuli associated with different types of exercise behavior (e.g. physical activity, sedentary behaviors) and energetic cost variations (e.g. decreased energetic cost, irrespective of the level of physical activity). We also examined evidence supporting the hypothesis that behaviors minimizing energetic cost (BMEC) are rewarding.

methodsTwo authors systematically searched, screened, extracted, and analyzed data from articles in the MEDLINE database.

resultsWe included 26 studies. Three outcomes of automatic processes were tested: affective reactions, attentional capture, and approach tendencies. Behavioral results show that physical activity can become attention-grabbing, automatically trigger positive affect, and elicit approach behaviors. These automatic reactions explain and predict exercise behaviors; however, the use of a wide variety of measures prevents drawing solid conclusions about the specific effects of automatic processes. Brain imaging results are scarce but show that stimuli associated with physical activity and, to a lesser extent, sedentary behaviors activate regions involved in reward processes. Studies investigating the rewarding value of behaviors driving energetic cost variations such as BMEC are lacking.

conclusionReward is an important factor in exercise behavior. The literature based on the investigation of automatic behaviors seems in line with the suggestion that physical activity is rewarding, at least for physically active individuals. Results suggest that sedentary behaviors could also be rewarding, although this evidence remains weak due to a lack of investigations. Finally, from an evolutionary perspective, BMEC are likely to be rewarding; however, no study has investigated this hypothesis. In sum, additional studies are required to establish a strong and complete framework of the reward processes underlying automatic exercise behavior.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorMotor ActivitySedentary BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedBrainChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedObesityRewardYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.