Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556949›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2018

More sugar? No, thank you! The elusive nature of low carbohydrate diets.

Dario Giugliano, Maria Ida Maiorino, Giuseppe Bellastella, Katherine Esposito

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beliefs and Experiences of Individuals Following a Zero-Carb Diet.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Changing Income-Related Inequality in Daily Nutrients Intake: A Longitudinal Analysis from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dario GiuglianoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic Sciences and Aging, Vanvitelli University, Naples, Italy. dario.giugliano@unicampania.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9377-873X
Maria Ida MaiorinoDiabetes Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic Sciences and Aging, Vanvitelli University, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BellastellaDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic Sciences and Aging, Vanvitelli University, Naples, Italy.
Katherine EspositoDiabetes Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic Sciences and Aging, Vanvitelli University, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decades, dietary guidelines focused on reducing saturated fat as the primary strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention, neglecting the many other potential effects of diet on health, in particular the harmful effects of sugar. A greater intake of soft drinks (sugar-sweetened beverages), for example, is associated with a 44% increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome, a higher risk of obesity, and a 26% increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus. Carbohydrates comprise around 55% of the typical western diet, ranging from 200 to 350 g/day in relation to a person's overall caloric intake. For long-term weight gain, food rich in refined grains, starches, and sugar appear to be major culprits. Low-carbohydrate diets restrict daily carbohydrates between 20 and 50 g, as in clinical ketogenic diets. The results of controlled trials show that people on ketogenic diets (a diet with no more than 50 g carbohydrates/day) tend to lose more weight than people on low-fat diets. Moreover, there is no good evidence for recommending low-fat diets, as low-carbohydrate diets lead to significantly greater weight loss (1.15 kg) than did low-fat interventions. However, the magnitude of such a benefit is small. As the quality of ingested carbohydrates seems more important than the quantity for health outcomes, people with metabolic disorders should avoid or substantially reduce low-fiber, rapidly digested, refined grains, starches, and added sugars. So, the consumption of the right carbohydrates (high-fiber, slowly digested, and whole grains), in a moderately lower amount (between 40 and 50% of daily energy content), is compatible with a state of good health and may represent a scientifically-based and palatable choice for people with metabolic disorders.

Indexed as

Dietary CarbohydratesDiet, Carbohydrate-RestrictedWeight LossDietary FatsEnergy IntakeHumansNutrition PolicyObesityDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary carbohydratesLow-carbohydrate dietLow-fat dietMetabolic disordersSugar

Identifiers

PMID29556949
OpenAlexW2792471471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.