ArticleWorld journal of surgery2018
A Transverse Colectomy is as Safe as an Extended Right or Left Colectomy for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal surgical approach for mid-transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Short- and long-term outcomes after transverse versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- Protocol digest of a randomized controlled trial comparing transverse colectomy with extended right hemicolectomy for Stage II/III transverse colon cancer: JCOG2304 (TACTICS).Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the mixed approach and medial approach in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of extended versus segmental resection for transverse colon cancer: A population-based analysis based on the SEER database.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Segmental or right hemi-colectomy? The optimal surgical procedure for transverse colon cancer: a propensity score-matched, multicenter, retrospective study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive vs. open segmental resection of the splenic flexure for cancer: a nationwide study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CNN).Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic transverse colectomy with extended complete mesocolic excision for mid-transverse colon cancer.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Article
- Surgical outcomes of various surgical approaches for transverse colon cancer.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2022Review
- Segmental transverse colectomy. Minimally invasive versus open approach: results from a multicenter collaborative study.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- Comparing the techniques and outcomes of laparoscopic transverse colectomy to laparoscopic hemicolectomy in mid-transverse colon cancer resection.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Bowel function recovery after laparoscopic transverse colectomy within an ERAS program: a comparison to right and left colectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Article
- Surgical management of adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon: What should be the extent of resection?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2021Article
- Long-Term Prognostic Outcomes of Right Hemicolectomy and Extended Right Hemicolectomy Performed for Hepatic Flexura and Proximal Transverse Colon Tumors.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough extended colectomy is often chosen for patients with transverse colon cancer, the optimal surgical approach for mid-transverse colon cancer has not been established.
methodsWe identified patients who underwent a transverse (TC) or an extended colectomy (EC) for mid-transverse colon cancer between 2004 and 2014. To adjust for potential selection bias between the groups, a propensity score matching analysis was performed.
resultsA total of 103 patients were included, of whom 63% underwent EC (right 47%, left 17%) and 37% TC. EC patients tend to have worse short-term outcomes. Although fewer lymph nodes were harvested after TC, 5-year overall (OS) ad disease-free survival (DFS) was comparable between the groups. When comparing long-term outcomes stage-by-stage, worse OS and DFS were seen in stage-II. All stage-II patients died of a non-cancer-related cause and recurrence occurred in pT4 TC patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. The propensity-matched cohort demonstrated similar postoperative morbidity, but more laparoscopic procedures in EC. Additionally, TC tumors were correlated with poorer histopathological features and disease recurrence was only seen after TC.
conclusionOur study underlines the oncological safety of a transverse colectomy for mid-transverse colon cancer. Although TC tumors were associated with poorer histopathological features, survival rates were comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.