Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556880›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2018

Critical Care Management of Peritonitis in a Low-Resource Setting.

Jennifer Rickard, Christian Ngarambe, Leonard Ndayizeye, Blair Smart, Robert Riviello, Jean Paul Majyambere

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer RickardUniversity Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda. gehr0059@umn.edu.
Christian NgarambeDepartment of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital of Butare, Butare, Rwanda.
Leonard NdayizeyeDepartment of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital of Butare, Butare, Rwanda.
Blair SmartDepartment of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Robert RivielloHuman Resources for Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Paul MajyambereUniversity of Gitwe, Gitwe, Rwanda.
University Teaching Hospital of Butare · RWBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali · RWInstitut Supérieur Pédagogique de Gitwe · RWUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of critically ill patients is challenging in a low-resource setting. In Rwanda, peritonitis is a common surgical condition where patients often present late, with advanced disease. We aim to describe critical care management of patients with peritonitis in Rwanda.

methodsData were collected at a tertiary referral hospital in Rwanda on patients undergoing operation for peritonitis over a 6-month period. Data included epidemiology, hospital course and outcomes. Patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) were compared with those not requiring ICU admission using Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

resultsOver a 6-month period, 280 patients were operated for peritonitis. Of these, 46 (16.4%) were admitted to the ICU. The most common diagnoses were intestinal obstruction (N = 17, 37.0%) and typhoid intestinal perforation (N = 6, 13.0%). Thirty-nine (89%) patients had sepsis. The median American Society of Anesthesiologist score was 3 (range 2-4), and the median Surgical Apgar Score was 4 (range 0-6). Twenty-four (52.2%) patients required vasopressors, with dopamine and adrenaline being the only vasopressors available. Patients admitted to the ICU, compared with non-critically ill patients, were more likely to have major complications (80.4 vs. 14%, p < 0.001), unplanned reoperation (28 vs. 10%, p < 0.001) and death (72 vs. 8%, p < 0.001).

conclusionPatients with peritonitis admitted to the ICU commonly presented with features of sepsis. Due to limited resources in this setting, interventions are primarily supportive with intravenous fluids, intravenous antibiotics, ventilator support and vasopressors. Morbidity and mortality remain high in this patient population.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessPovertyAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical CareFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsIntestinal PerforationMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePeritonitisAnti-Bacterial AgentsVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID29556880
OpenAlexW2790654287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.