ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2018
Renal Nerve Stimulation as Procedural End Point for Renal Sympathetic Denervation.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overcoming variable response in renal denervation: Key strategies for reliable clinical implementation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Renal nerve stimulation modulates renal blood flow in a frequency-dependent manner.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Article
- Renal nerve stimulation modulates renal blood flow in a frequency-dependent manner.Research square · 2025Article
- Effects of renal denervation at BP-elevation/reduction sites guided by renal nerve stimulation on atrial neural and structural remodeling in a hypertensive canine model.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- A clinical prediction model for blood pressure changes after renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The role of renal nerve stimulation in percutaneous renal denervation for hypertension: A mini-review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Review
- Buddhist Activities related to Sedentary behavior and Hypertension in Tibetan monks.Journal of human hypertension · 2019Article
- Device-Based Neuromodulation for Resistant Hypertension Therapy.Circulation research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRenal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as treatment option for hypertension has a strong rationale; however, variable effects on blood pressure (BP) have been reported ranging from non-response to marked reductions in BP. The absence of a procedural end point for RDN is one of the potential factors associated with the variable response. Studies have suggested the use of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) to adequately address this issue. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and experimental data available regarding the effects of RNS in the setting of RDN. RECENT
findingsAnimal studies have shown that high-frequency electrical stimulation of the sympathetic nerves in the adventitia of the renal arteries elicits an increase in BP and leads to an increased norepinephrine spillover as a marker of increased sympathetic activity and these effects of stimulation were attenuated or blunted after RDN. In a human feasibility study using RNS both before and after RDN, similar BP responses were observed. Moreover, in patients with resistant hypertension, RNS-induced changes in BP appeared to be correlated with 24-h BP response after RDN. These data suggest that RNS is a useful tool to identify renal sympathetic nerve fibers in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension undergoing RDN, and to predict the likely effectiveness of RDN treatments. In acute procedural settings both in animal and human models, RNS elicits increase in BP and HR before RDN and these effects are blunted after RDN. Up to now, there is preliminary evidence that the RNS-induced BP changes predict 24-h ABPM outcome at follow-up in patients with resistant hypertension. Of note, studies are small sized and results of large trials comparing conventional RDN to RNS-guided RDN are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.