ArticleNeurosurgical review2019
Impact of randomized controlled trials on neurosurgical practice in decompressive craniectomy for ischemic stroke.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of surgical intervention trials on healthcare: A systematic review of assessment methods, healthcare outcomes, and determinants.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Trends of Major Cerebrovascular Procedures After Mechanical Thrombectomy Implementation: A Nationwide Observational Study in Germany (2015-2023).Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Risk factors for decompressive craniectomy after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke.Neurosurgical review · 2020Article
- Decompressive craniectomy for acute ischemic stroke.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Review
- [Advances in surgical treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2019Review
- Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are gold standard for comparing treatment modalities. Recently, RCTs transformed ischemic stroke care by first proving benefit of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and later of interventional mechanical thrombectomy. Aim of this study was to explore the impact of RCTs on neurosurgical practice. RCTs investigating DC and thrombectomy were identified. Annual numbers of DCs for ischemic stroke between 2000 and 2017 were determined and correlated with publication dates of RCTs. The initial RCTs demonstrating efficacy of DC were published in 2007, followed by an increase in DC numbers between 2008 and 2009. The first RCTs on mechanical thrombectomy were published in 2014 and 2015, with a decline in DCs observed between 2015 and 2016. There is a close temporal relationship between publication of these RCTs and changes in neurosurgical practice. Dynamics of annual DCs appear to correlate with the publication of RCTs. Significantly positive results of surgical and interventional RCTs were translated into clinical practice with a latency of 1 year, as reflected by shifts in annual DC numbers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.