Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556794›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2018

Therapeutic Vaccines for Hypertension: a New Option for Clinical Practice.

Hironori Nakagami, Ryuichi Morishita

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pre-emptive medicine for hypertension and its prospects.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hironori NakagamiDepartment of Health Development and Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. nakagami@cgt.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Ryuichi MorishitaDepartment of Clinical Gene Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewVaccines are commonly used as preventive methods, primarily against infectious diseases. The goal of our study is to develop the therapeutic vaccine for hypertension. RECENT

findingsWe and others recently reported that an angiotensin II (AngII) vaccine for hypertension successfully attenuated elevated blood pressures in an animal model without any immunogenic side effects. In this system, an immunogenic molecule (i.e., KLH) with adjuvants provides an antigen that supports the activation of helper T cells. In addition, pretreatment with the AngII vaccine exerts neuroprotective effects in a cerebral ischemia model and cardioprotective effects in a myocardial infarction model. In the early phase of clinical trial, the administration of an AngII vaccine (AngQb-Cyt006) successfully decreased blood pressure in hypertensive patients with the increase of anti-AngII antibody titer. Increasing the effectiveness of drug adherence interventions in the clinical setting may have a large impact on the health of the population, which can be improved by using successful therapeutic vaccines. In this review, we describe the concept of therapeutic vaccines for hypertension and future directions for therapeutic vaccines.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IIAnimalsBlood PressureDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypertensionOligopeptidesVaccinesAngiotensin IICYT006-AngQbOligopeptidesVaccinesAngiotensin IIAntibodyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID29556794
OpenAlexW2803108440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.