Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556778›Full record

ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2018

Anti-Candida activity of antidepressants sertraline and fluoxetine: effect upon pre-formed biofilms.

Ana S Oliveira, José Martinez-de-Oliveira, Gilbert G G Donders, Rita Palmeira-de-Oliveira, Ana Palmeira-de-Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exploring the Antibiofilm Effect of Sertraline in Synergy withPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial Activity of Sertraline onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Nine Things Genomics Can Tell Us AboutFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana S OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Center (CICS-UBI), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal. ana_g2s@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0659-4386
José Martinez-de-OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Center (CICS-UBI), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8608-0248
Gilbert G G DondersFemicare VZW Clinical Research for Women, Tienen, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-6254
Rita Palmeira-de-OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Center (CICS-UBI), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-8355
Ana Palmeira-de-OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Center (CICS-UBI), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-3769
University of Beira Interior · PTAntwerp University Hospital · BE

Funding

COMPETE POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007491Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa UID/Multi/00709/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida spp. has the ability to form biofilms. The most prescribed drugs for Candida infections, azoles, have shown to be less effective when biofilms are present. In addition, increasing treatment costs and the fact that most prescribed antifungal drugs have only fungistatic activity justify the search for new treatment strategies. One promising approach is third generation antidepressants, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), because of their proven antifungal activity against several Candida spp. Thus, the aim of this work was to determine the ability of two commonly used SSRIs, fluoxetine and sertraline, to impair both biofilm metabolic viability and biofilm biomass. The in vitro effect of fluoxetine and sertraline was individually tested against biofilm metabolic viability and biofilm biomass using the MTT assay and the Crystal Violet assay, respectively. For both drugs, a dose-dependent reduction on both biofilm metabolism and biomass was present. At high concentrations, fluoxetine was able to reduce biofilm metabolism by 96% (C. krusei) and biofilm biomass by 82% (C. glabrata), when compared to the control. At similar conditions, sertraline achieved a reduction of 88% on biofilm biomass (C. glabrata) and 90% on biofilm metabolism (C. parapsilosis). Moreover, fluoxetine showed interesting anti-biofilm activity at previously reported planktonic MIC values and even at sub-MIC values. These results reinforce the potential interest of SSRIs as anti-biofilm agents to be study to counteract resistance phenomena on candidosis.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsAntifungal AgentsBiofilmsCandidaDrug RepositioningFluoxetineFormazansGentian VioletHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilitySertralineStaining and LabelingTetrazolium SaltsThiazolesAntidepressive AgentsAntifungal AgentsFluoxetineFormazansGentian VioletMTT formazanSertralineTetrazolium SaltsThiazolesthiazolyl blueBiofilmBiomass.Candida spp.FluoxetineMetabolic activitySertraline

Identifiers

PMID29556778
OpenAlexW2791579149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.