Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556766›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?

Sergio J Sanabria, Orcun Goksel, Katharina Martini, Serafino Forte, Thomas Frauenfelder, Rahel A Kubik-Huch, Marga B Rominger

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Speed-of-sound imaging using diverging waves.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sergio J SanabriaComputer-assisted Applications in Medicine, ETH Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 7, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Orcun GokselComputer-assisted Applications in Medicine, ETH Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 7, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Katharina MartiniInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Serafino ForteDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, Im Ergel 1, 5404, Baden, Switzerland.
Thomas FrauenfelderInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Rahel A Kubik-HuchDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, Im Ergel 1, 5404, Baden, Switzerland.
Marga B RomingerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland. Marga.Rominger@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a novel hand-held ultrasound (US) method for breast density assessment that measures the speed of sound (SoS), in comparison to the ACR mammographic (MG) categories.

methodsACR-MG density (a=fatty to d=extremely dense) and SoS-US were assessed in the retromamillary, inner and outer segments of 106 women by two radiographers. A conventional US system was used for SoS-US. A reflector served as timing reference for US signals transmitted through the breasts. Four blinded readers assessed average SoS (m/s), ΔSoS (segment-variation SoS; m/s) and the ACR-MG density. The highest SoS and ΔSoS values of the three segments were used for MG-ACR whole breast comparison.

resultsSoS-US breasts were examined in <2 min. Mean SoS values of densities a-d were 1,421 m/s (SD 14), 1,432 m/s (SD 17), 1,448 m/s (SD 20) and 1,500 m/s (SD 31), with significant differences between all groups (p<0.001). The SoS-US comfort scores and inter-reader agreement were significantly better than those for MG (1.05 vs. 2.05 and 0.982 vs. 0.774; respectively). A strong segment correlation between SoS and ACR-MG breast density was evident (r

conclusionsUsing hand-held SoS-US, radiographers measured breast density without discomfort, readers evaluated measurements with high inter-reader agreement, and SoS-US correlated significantly with ACR-MG breast-density categories. KEY POINTS: • The novel speed-of-sound ultrasound correlated significantly with mammographic ACR breast density categories. • Radiographers measured breast density without women discomfort or radiation. • SoS-US can be implemented on a standard US machine. • SoS-US shows potential for a quantifiable, cost-effective assessment of breast density.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, MammaryBreastBreast densityBreast neoplasmsMammographyUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.