Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556706›Full record

Trial reportArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2018

Effect of intra-operative glove changing during cesarean section on post-operative complications: a randomized controlled trial.

Jonathan D Scrafford, Buvana Reddy, Colleen Rivard, Rachel Isaksson Vogel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan D ScraffordDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Buvana ReddyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Colleen RivardDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Rachel Isaksson VogelDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. isak0023@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-8464
University of Minnesota · USRegions Hospital · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the rates of wound-related complications among women undergoing a cesarean section when the surgical team used intra-operative glove changing versus usual care.

methodsAll women undergoing a cesarean section at a single, county hospital were randomized to usual care or intra-operative glove changing prior to abdominal closure. Participants were randomized at the time of decision for cesarean section; surgeons were not blinded to the randomization arm. The primary outcome was any wound-related complication, including wound hematoma, seroma, skin separation of at least 1 cm, wound infection, or other incisional abnormality requiring treatment within 8 weeks of surgery. To detect a reduction in the primary outcome from 17% in the control group to 9% in the intervention group with 80% power, a total of 554 women (277 per group) were required. Secondary outcomes included other infectious complications including endometritis and other superficial or deep soft tissue infections.

resultsFrom August 2015 to November 2016, 277 women were randomized to usual care and 276 women were randomized to intra-operative glove changing. The two groups were well balanced in terms of demographic data, comorbid conditions and surgical characteristics. Intra-operative glove changing led to a significant decrease in composite wound complications from 13.6% in the control group to 6.4% in the intervention group (p = 0.008).

conclusionIntra-operative glove changing prior to abdominal closure during cesarean section significantly reduced the incidence of post-operative wound complications.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionGloves, SurgicalAdultEndometritisFemaleHematomaHumansIncidenceIntraoperative CareIntraoperative PeriodMinnesotaPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodPregnancyProspective StudiesSeromaCesarean sectionComplicationsGlovesInfectionObstetricsWound

Identifiers

PMID29556706
PMCPMC5948161
OpenAlexW2791444558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.