ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2018
[Correction of posttraumatic deformities of the distal tibia with focal dome osteotomy].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Correction of complex defomities around the Knee Joint].Der Orthopade · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupramalleolar deformities require surgical correction to avoid posttraumatic osteoarthrosis of the knee or ankle joint and to prevent definitive treatment options, such as total ankle arthroplasty or arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Various methods for the operative correction of supramalleolar deformities have been described in the literature.
objectiveWhat results can be achieved with focal dome osteotomy to correct posttraumatic supramalleolar deformities? MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 10 patients (mean age 37 years) with a supramalleolar posttraumatic deformity were treated by focal dome osteotomy. The mean follow-up was 27 months (min. 6, max. 105 months), 5 patients were female and 5 male. The supramalleolar varus/valgus deformity was on average 20° (at least 12°, maximum 33°). Preoperative and postoperative mechanical axis and joint angles were determined on digital radiographs. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used to assess the clinical outcome.
resultsIn seven patients the anatomical leg axis could be restored. In three patients a residual deformity of 2.8° was observed. Bone grafting was not necessary in any of the cases. Of the patients eight had free ankle mobility and two showed an average movement limit of 30° compared to the contralateral side. Posttraumatic ankle arthrosis was not observed in the short-term and medium-term results. The mean AOFAS score of 80 points (minimum 70, maximum 98) documented a functionally good result.
conclusionSupramalleolar dome type osteotomy is a technically difficult method for acute correction of supramalleolar deformities. The functional results and complication rates are comparable to those in the literature for alternative osteotomy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.