Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556587›Full record

ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018

Species translatable blood gene signature as a marker of exposure to smoking: computational approaches of the top ranked teams in the sbv IMPROVER Systems Toxicology challenge.

Ömer Sinan Saraç, Rahul Kumar, Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Ali Tuğrul Balcı, İsmail Bilgen, Roberto Romero, Adi L Tarca

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ömer Sinan SaraçIstanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rahul KumarInstitute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India.
Sandeep Kumar DhandaLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ali Tuğrul BalcıIstanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
İsmail BilgenIstanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Roberto RomeroPerinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, MD, and Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Adi L TarcaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Istanbul Technical University · TRInstitute of Microbial Technology · INLa Jolla Institute for Immunology · USMichigan State University · USWayne State University · US

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD023342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crowdsourcing has been used to address computational challenges in systems biology and assess translation of findings across species. Sub-challenge 2 of the sbv IMPROVER Systems Toxicology Challenge was designed to determine whether a common set of genes can be used to identify exposure to cigarette smoke in both human and mouse. Participating teams used a training set of human and mouse blood gene expression data to derive parsimonious models (up to 40 genes) that classify subjects into exposure groups: smokers, former smokers, and never-smokers. Teams were ranked based on two classification performance metrics evaluated on a blinded test dataset. Prediction of current exposure to cigarette smoke in human and mouse by a common prediction model was achieved by the top ranked team (Team 219) with 89% balanced accuracy (BAC), while past exposure was predicted with only 57% BAC. The prediction model of the top ranked team was a random forest classifier trained on sets of genes that appeared best for each species separately with no overlap between species. By contrast, Team 264, ranked second (tied with Team 250), selected genes that were simultaneously predictive in both species and achieved 80% and 59% BAC when predicting current and past exposure, respectively. These performance values were lower than the 96.5% and 61% BAC estimates for current and past exposure, respectively, obtained by Team 264 (top ranked in sub-challenge 1) when using only human data. Unlike past exposure, current exposure to cigarette smoke can be accurately assessed in both human and mouse with a common prediction model based on blood mRNAs. However, requiring a

Indexed as

computational challengepredictive modelingsmoking biomarkerspecies-translatable gene signatureSystems toxicology

Identifiers

PMID29556587
PMCPMC5856122
OpenAlexW2608536691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.