Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556406›Full record

ReviewNew microbes and new infections2018

'

A Portillo, P Santibáñez, A M Palomar, S Santibáñez, J A Oteo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in New microbes and new infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular detection and characterization ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Surveillance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ticks From Mink and Their Associated Microorganisms in Spain.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A PortilloCenter of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital San Pedro-Center of Biomedical Research from La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Spain.
P SantibáñezCenter of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital San Pedro-Center of Biomedical Research from La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Spain.
A M PalomarCenter of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital San Pedro-Center of Biomedical Research from La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Spain.
S SantibáñezCenter of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital San Pedro-Center of Biomedical Research from La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Spain.
J A OteoCenter of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital San Pedro-Center of Biomedical Research from La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Spain.
Hospital San Pedro · ESCenter for Biomedical Research of La Rioja · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'

Indexed as

‘Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis’coinfectionDermacentor reticulatusdoxycyclineEuropeIxodes ricinusneoehrlichiosisreservoirticktick-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID29556406
PMCPMC5857181
OpenAlexW2782509772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.