ArticleNew microbes and new infections2018
Careful use of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values for the identification of
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellulase and β-glucosidase activity of crude enzyme extracted from fresh and expired soybean tempeh.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbiome and plant relationship: a symbiosis against phytopathogens.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis using CRISPR/Cas14a-enabled molecular techniques.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Bacterial community structure and secondary metabolite insights from halophiles at Oniru Beach, Lagos.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?Poultry science · 2025Review
- Systemic Infection Caused by Mycobacterium fortuitum Following Aortic Valve Transplantation-Employing Combined Molecular Techniques for Accurate Species Identification.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Potential pitfalls in claiming novel taxa.iMeta · 2025Article
- Clinical metagenomics analysis of bacterial and fungal microbiota from sputum of patients suspected with tuberculosis infection based on nanopore sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Secondary Metabolites from a New Antibiotic-Producing Endophytic Streptomyces Isolate Inhibited Pathogenic and Multidrug-ResistantTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- A rapid and simple MALDI-TOF MS lipid profiling method for differentiatingJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Culture-independent detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Biochip-Based Identification of Mycobacterial Species in Russia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Phylogenomic analyses of the Listeriaceae family support species reclassification and proposal of a new family and new genera.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2024Article
- The Intriguing Pattern of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Bulgaria and Description ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Insights into mycobacteriome composition in Mycobacterium bovis-infected African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) tissue samples.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Selective Isolation and Identification of Microorganisms with Dual Capabilities: Leather Biodegradation and Heavy Metal Resistance for Industrial Applications.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Genomic and environmental controls on Castellaniella biogeography in an anthropogenically disturbed subsurface.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Diversity and Screening of Cellulolytic Microorganisms from Mangrove Forests, Natural Parks, Paddy Field, and Sugarcane Plantation in Panay Island, Philippines.International journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Novel microbiotaFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- ASV vs OTUs clustering: Effects on alpha, beta, and gamma diversities in microbiome metabarcoding studies.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to evaluate the suitability of 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence similarity for the classification of new
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.