Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556283›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

A retrospective study of pattern of recurrence after radical surgery for thoracic esophageal carcinoma with or without postoperative radiotherapy.

Yichun Wang, Li Zhang, Dongmei Ye, Wanli Xia, Jun Jiang, Xiumei Wang, Mingxia Zhang, Fan Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Treatment of Anastomotic Recurrence After Esophagectomy.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yichun WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Dongmei YeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Wanli XiaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Jun JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Xiumei WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Mingxia ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
Fan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, P.R. China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the recurrence pattern of thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC) following radical surgery for guiding postoperative radiotherapy (PRT). Patterns of recurrence were analyzed in patients with recurrence for the first time after radical surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Anhui, China) from January 2012 to December 2015. A total of 244 patients were reviewed in the study. The mean recurrence time for patients with PRT was >1 month longer than that for patients without PRT. The lymphatic, anastomotic and hematological recurrence ratios were 87.9 vs. 69.2%, 4.0 vs. 11.5% and 8.0 vs. 17.2%, respectively for patients without and with PRT. The most common recurrence regions were staion1 and station 2-4 (30.0 vs. 36.5% and 37.2% vs. 23.1%, respectively, for patients without and with PRT). The lymphatic recurrence of upper TEC was almost in station1 and station 2-4 (infield). The middle and lower TEC also had a high probability of lymphatic recurrence in station 1 and station 2-4 (totally 76.3 vs. 57.6% and 61.9 vs. 61.1%, respectively). The recurrence ratio significantly decreased in station 2-4 (infield) for middle TEC patients with PRT compared with patients without PRT (P=0.03), while no significant differences in the lymphatic recurrence ratios were observed in other regions (P>0.05). The differences of recurrence ratios in station 7, station 8 and celiac regions (infield) for lower TEC patients without and with PRT also demonstrated no statistical significance (P>0.05). The results of the present study indicated that the lower neck, supraclavicular regions and upper mediastinal regions (station 1, 2 and 4) should be included in the clinic target volume (CTV) for PRT, while lower mediastinal regions, celiac regions and anastomotic may not be included in CTV.

Indexed as

clinical target volumeesophageal canceresophagectomyradiotherapyrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID29556283
PMCPMC5843998
OpenAlexW2783591954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.