ArticleOncology letters2018
A retrospective study of pattern of recurrence after radical surgery for thoracic esophageal carcinoma with or without postoperative radiotherapy.
Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of Lymph Node Recurrence after Esophagectomy of pT2-3 N0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for postoperative recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Treatment of Anastomotic Recurrence After Esophagectomy.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Patterns of failure and long-term outcome of postoperative radiotherapy on the survival of patients with pathological T3N0M0 esophageal cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Preliminary evaluation of postoperative radiotherapy with small T-shaped field in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Mapping of Cervical and Upper Mediastinal Lymph Node Recurrence for Guiding Clinical Target Delineation of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in lower Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Radical Esophagectomy: a CT-based atlas and its clinical implications for Adjuvant Radiotherapy.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Characteristics Associated with Nodal and Distant Recurrence After Radical Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Postoperative Radiotherapy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma with Upfront R0 Esophagectomy.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
- Risk Factors and Patterns of Abdominal Lymph Node Recurrence After Radical Surgery for Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- The impact of adjuvant therapies on patient survival and the recurrence patterns for resected stage IIa-IVa lower thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the recurrence pattern of thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC) following radical surgery for guiding postoperative radiotherapy (PRT). Patterns of recurrence were analyzed in patients with recurrence for the first time after radical surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Anhui, China) from January 2012 to December 2015. A total of 244 patients were reviewed in the study. The mean recurrence time for patients with PRT was >1 month longer than that for patients without PRT. The lymphatic, anastomotic and hematological recurrence ratios were 87.9 vs. 69.2%, 4.0 vs. 11.5% and 8.0 vs. 17.2%, respectively for patients without and with PRT. The most common recurrence regions were staion1 and station 2-4 (30.0 vs. 36.5% and 37.2% vs. 23.1%, respectively, for patients without and with PRT). The lymphatic recurrence of upper TEC was almost in station1 and station 2-4 (infield). The middle and lower TEC also had a high probability of lymphatic recurrence in station 1 and station 2-4 (totally 76.3 vs. 57.6% and 61.9 vs. 61.1%, respectively). The recurrence ratio significantly decreased in station 2-4 (infield) for middle TEC patients with PRT compared with patients without PRT (P=0.03), while no significant differences in the lymphatic recurrence ratios were observed in other regions (P>0.05). The differences of recurrence ratios in station 7, station 8 and celiac regions (infield) for lower TEC patients without and with PRT also demonstrated no statistical significance (P>0.05). The results of the present study indicated that the lower neck, supraclavicular regions and upper mediastinal regions (station 1, 2 and 4) should be included in the clinic target volume (CTV) for PRT, while lower mediastinal regions, celiac regions and anastomotic may not be included in CTV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.