ArticleGut pathogens2018
Genomic characterization of malonate positive
Article in Gut pathogens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Neonate Caused by Cronobacter sakazakii Sequence Type 64 Strain of CRISPR Sublineage b.Emerging infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Occurrence, molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance ofCurrent research in food science · 2023Article
- Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Article
- Genomic Landscape and Phenotypic Assessment ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- The Secretion of Toxins and Other Exoproteins ofMicroorganisms · 2020Review
- Analysis of the Molecular Diversity AmongFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Genome Insights of the Plant-Growth Promoting BacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Prevalence, Distribution, and Phylogeny of Type Two Toxin-Antitoxin Genes Possessed byMicroorganisms · 2019Article
- Draft genomes ofStandards in genomic sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalonate utilization, an important differential trait, well recognized as being possessed by six of the seven
resultsIn this study, the presence of a malonate utilization operon in these strains was initially identified by DNA microarray analysis (MA) out of a pool of 347 strains obtained from various surveillance studies involving clinical, spices, milk powder sources and powdered infant formula production facilities in Ireland and Germany, and dried dairy powder manufacturing facilities in the USA. All ST64
conclusionsUntil this investigation, the presence of malonate-positive Csak strains, which are associated with foods and clinical cases, was under appreciated. If this trait was used solely to identify
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.