Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29556016›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2018

A cold-blooded view of adaptive immunity.

Martin F Flajnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 347 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The molecular evolution of vertebrate organs.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin F FlajnikDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA. MFlajnik@som.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY OF THE MHCR01AI027877 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FLAJNIK, MARTIN F · 1995 to 2009
$3.2M
Evolution of Adaptive ImmunityR01OD010549 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FLAJNIK, MARTIN F · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI027877NIH HHS R01 OD010549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptive immune system arose 500 million years ago in ectothermic (cold-blooded) vertebrates. Classically, the adaptive immune system has been defined by the presence of lymphocytes expressing recombination-activating gene (RAG)-dependent antigen receptors and the MHC. These features are found in all jawed vertebrates, including cartilaginous and bony fish, amphibians and reptiles and are most likely also found in the oldest class of jawed vertebrates, the extinct placoderms. However, with the discovery of an adaptive immune system in jawless fish based on an entirely different set of antigen receptors - the variable lymphocyte receptors - the divergence of T and B cells, and perhaps innate-like lymphocytes, goes back to the origin of all vertebrates. This Review explores how recent developments in comparative immunology have furthered our understanding of the origins and function of the adaptive immune system.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityEvolution, MolecularAnimalsFishesGenetic VariationHumansImmunity, InnateImmunity, MucosalImmunoglobulin IsotypesLymphocytesLymphoid TissueMajor Histocompatibility ComplexReceptors, AntigenVertebratesImmunoglobulin IsotypesReceptors, Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29556016
PMCPMC6084782
OpenAlexW2790505494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.