ArticleScientific reports2018
Integrated Modelling of Cell Responses after Irradiation for DNA-Targeted Effects and Non-Targeted Effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimising mutation load as a mechanism for low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity and induced radioresistance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Equivalent relative biological effectiveness for cell survival and micronuclei formation: insights from a biophysical approach.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The impact of dose rate on responses of human lens epithelial cells to ionizing irradiation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- High-LET-Radiation-Induced Persistent DNA Damage Response Signaling and Gastrointestinal Cancer Development.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Datasets of in vitro clonogenic assays showing low dose hyper-radiosensitivity and induced radioresistance.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Radiobiology of stereotactic radiotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022Review
- A "Failed" Assay Development for the Discovery of Rescuing Small Molecules from the Radiation Damage.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2021Article
- 4-Methylumbelliferone administration enhances radiosensitivity of human fibrosarcoma by intercellular communication.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Modelling Dose Effects from Space Irradiations: Combination of High-LET and Low-LET Radiations with a Modified Microdosimetric Kinetic Model.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A model of radiation action based on nanodosimetry and the application to ultra-soft X-rays.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2020Article
- Article
- Coupling of cell fate selection model enhances DNA damage response and may underlie BE phenomenon.IET systems biology · 2020Article
- Nitric Oxide Is Involved in Heavy Ion-Induced Non-Targeted Effects in Human Fibroblasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Intensity Modulated Radiation Fields Induce Protective Effects and Reduce Importance of Dose-Rate Effects.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Analysis of the high-dose-range radioresistance of prostate cancer cells, including cancer stem cells, based on a stochastic model.Journal of radiation research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intercellular communication after ionizing radiation exposure, so-called non-targeted effects (NTEs), reduces cell survival. Here we describe an integrated cell-killing model considering NTEs and DNA damage along radiation particle tracks, known as DNA-targeted effects (TEs) based on repair kinetics of DNA damage. The proposed model was applied to a series of experimental data, i.e., signal concentration, DNA damage kinetics, cell survival curve and medium transfer bystander effects (MTBEs). To reproduce the experimental data, the model considers the following assumptions: (i) the linear-quadratic (LQ) function as absorbed dose to express the hit probability to emit cell-killing signals, (ii) the potentially repair of DNA lesions induced by NTEs, and (iii) lower efficiency of repair for the damage in NTEs than that in TEs. By comparing the model results with experimental data, we found that signal-induced DNA damage and lower repair efficiency in non-hit cells are responsible for NTE-related repair kinetics of DNA damage, cell survival curve with low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) and MTBEs. From the standpoint of modelling, the integrated cell-killing model with the LQ relation and a different repair function for NTEs provide a reasonable signal-emission probability and a new estimation of low-dose HRS linked to DNA repair efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.