Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29555857›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Role of the 5-HT

Katrin H Preller, Leonhard Schilbach, Thomas Pokorny, Jan Flemming, Erich Seifritz, Franz X Vollenweider

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Effective connectivity changes in LSD-induced altered states of consciousness in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Synthetic surprise as the foundation of the psychedelic experience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Katrin H PrellerNeuropsychopharmacology and Brain Imaging, preller@bli.uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-0413-7672
Leonhard SchilbachIndependent Max Planck Research Group for Social Neuroscience and Clinic for Disorders of Social Interaction, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany, and.
Thomas PokornyNeuropsychopharmacology and Brain Imaging.
Jan FlemmingNeuropsychopharmacology and Brain Imaging.
Erich SeifritzDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital for Psychiatry Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Franz X VollenweiderNeuropsychopharmacology and Brain Imaging.
University of Zurich · CHMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distortions of self-experience are critical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and have detrimental effects on social interactions. In light of the immense need for improved and targeted interventions for social impairments, it is important to better understand the neurochemical substrates of social interaction abilities. We therefore investigated the pharmacological and neural correlates of self- and other-initiated social interaction. In a double-blind, randomized, counterbalanced, crossover study 24 healthy human participants (18 males and 6 females) received either (1) placebo + placebo, (2) placebo + lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD; 100 μg, p.o.), or (3) ketanserin (40 mg, p.o.) + LSD (100 μg, p.o.) on three different occasions. Participants took part in an interactive task using eye-tracking and functional magnetic resonance imaging completing trials of self- and other-initiated joint and non-joint attention. Results demonstrate first, that LSD reduced activity in brain areas important for self-processing, but also social cognition; second, that change in brain activity was linked to subjective experience; and third, that LSD decreased the efficiency of establishing joint attention. Furthermore, LSD-induced effects were blocked by the serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAdultAttentionBrainCognitionEye MovementsFemaleHallucinogensHumansKetanserinLysergic Acid DiethylamideMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSerotonin AntagonistsSerotonin Receptor AgonistsHallucinogensKetanserinLysergic Acid DiethylamideSerotonin AntagonistsSerotonin Receptor Agonistseye-trackinghallucinogensjoint attentionpsychedelicsserotoninsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID29555857
PMCPMC6596041
OpenAlexW2790184875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.