Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29555733›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Phylogenetic homogenization of amphibian assemblages in human-altered habitats across the globe.

A Justin Nowakowski, Luke O Frishkoff, Michelle E Thompson, Tatiana M Smith, Brian D Todd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Global impacts of exotic eucalypt plantations on wildlife.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Predicting undetected native vascular plant diversity at a global scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Archival mitogenomes identify invasion by theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The invasive legumeEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Global effects of forest modification on herpetofauna communities.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Despite early deaths, toads persist in human-dominated habitats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A Justin NowakowskiDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; nowakowskia@gmail.com frishkol@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4381-6742
Luke O FrishkoffDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada; nowakowskia@gmail.com frishkol@gmail.com.
Michelle E ThompsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199.
Tatiana M SmithDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Brian D ToddDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat conversion is driving biodiversity loss and restructuring species assemblages across the globe. Responses to habitat conversion vary widely, however, and little is known about the degree to which shared evolutionary history underlies changes in species richness and composition. We analyzed data from 48 studies, comprising 438 species on five continents, to understand how taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of amphibian assemblages shifts in response to habitat conversion. We found that evolutionary history explains the majority of variation in species' responses to habitat conversion, with specific clades scattered across the amphibian tree of life being favored by human land uses. Habitat conversion led to an average loss of 139 million years of amphibian evolutionary history within assemblages, high species and lineage turnover at landscape scales, and phylogenetic homogenization at the global scale (despite minimal taxonomic homogenization). Lineage turnover across habitats was greatest in lowland tropical regions where large species pools and stable climates have perhaps given rise to many microclimatically specialized species. Together, our results indicate that strong phylogenetic clustering of species' responses to habitat conversion mediates nonrandom structuring of local assemblages and loss of global phylogenetic diversity. In an age of rapid global change, identifying clades that are most sensitive to habitat conversion will help prioritize use of limited conservation resources.

Indexed as

EcosystemPhylogenyAmphibiansAnimalsBiodiversityBiological EvolutionHumansAnthropocene biogeographybiodiversityhabitat lossland usephylogenetic generalized linear mixed model

Identifiers

PMID29555733
PMCPMC5899437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.