Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554946›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Molecular detection of Anaplasma bovis, Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon felis in cats from Luanda, Angola.

Ana Cristina Oliveira, Maria Francisca Luz, Sara Granada, Hugo Vilhena, Yaarit Nachum-Biala, Ana Patrícia Lopes, Luís Cardoso, Gad Baneth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic characters ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diversity ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Cristina OliveiraClínica Casa dos Animais, Luanda, Angola.
Maria Francisca LuzClínica Casa dos Animais, Luanda, Angola.
Sara GranadaClínica Casa dos Animais, Luanda, Angola.
Hugo VilhenaCenter for Investigation Vasco da Gama (CIVG), Department of Veterinary Medicine, Vasco da Gama University School, Coimbra, Portugal.
Yaarit Nachum-BialaKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Ana Patrícia LopesAnimal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Luís CardosoAnimal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Gad BanethKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel. gad.baneth@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-7549-1305
Clínica Sagrada Esperança · AOUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PTHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular identification of tick-borne pathogen infection in cats from Africa is scarce. The presence of bacterial (Anaplasma and Ehrlichia) and protozoal (Babesia and Hepatozoon) agents was investigated in blood samples from 102 domestic cats from Luanda, Angola, by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing.

resultsThree cats (2.9%) were found infected with Ehrlichia canis, three (2.9%) with Hepatozoon felis and one (1.0%) with Anaplasma bovis. The prevalence of infections with one single agent was 4.9%, and that of infection with two agents (i.e. E. canis and H. felis) was 1.0%. In total, six cats (5.9%) were found infected with at least one of the detected tick-borne agents.

conclusionsThis is the first report of A. bovis, E. canis and H. felis in cats from Angola. To the best of our knowledge, A. bovis is also being reported for the first time in domestic cats outside of Japan. Cats are at a low to moderate risk of being infected with tick-borne agents in Luanda.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAngolaAnimalsCatsCoccidiosisEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisEucoccidiidaJapanPetsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNATick-Borne DiseasesDNA sequencingFeline vector-borne diseasesPolymerase chain reactionTick-borne pathogens

Identifiers

PMID29554946
PMCPMC5859530
OpenAlexW2804154509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.