Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554927›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroinflammation2018

MOG-IgG in primary and secondary chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a multicenter study of 200 patients and review of the literature.

S Jarius, K Ruprecht, J P Stellmann, A Huss, I Ayzenberg, A Willing, C Trebst, M Pawlitzki, A Abdelhak, T Grüter and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Detection of MOG-IgG by cell-based assay: moving from discovery to clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. How DIRS is refining concepts.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

S JariusMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. sven.jarius@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
K RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J P StellmannInstitut für Neuroimmunologie und Multiple Sklerose (INIMS), Zentrum für Molekulare Neurobiologie Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
A HussDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
I AyzenbergDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
A WillingInstitut für Neuroimmunologie und Multiple Sklerose (INIMS), Zentrum für Molekulare Neurobiologie Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
C TrebstDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
M PawlitzkiDepartment of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
A AbdelhakDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
T GrüterDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
F LeypoldtDepartment of Neurology and Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
J HaasMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
I KleiterDepartment of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
H TumaniDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
K FechnerInstitute of Experimental Immunology, affiliated to Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
M ReindlClinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
F PaulDepartment of Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
B WildemannMolecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. brigitte.wildemann@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Ruhr University Bochum · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEuroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika (Germany) · DEFachklinik für Neurologie Dietenbronn · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibodies to human full-length myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) as detected by new-generation cell-based assays have recently been described in patients presenting with acute demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, including patients previously diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, only limited data are available on the relevance of MOG-IgG testing in patients with chronic progressive demyelinating disease. It is unclear if patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) should routinely be tested for MOG-IgG.

objectiveTo evaluate the frequency of MOG-IgG among patients classified as having PPMS or SPMS based on current diagnostic criteria.

methodsFor this purpose, we retrospectively tested serum samples of 200 patients with PPMS or SPMS for MOG-IgG using cell-based assays. In addition, we performed a review of the entire English language literature on MOG-IgG published between 2011 and 2017.

resultsNone of 139 PPMS and 61 SPMS patients tested was positive for MOG-IgG. Based on a review of the literature, we identified 35 further MOG-IgG tests in patients with PPMS and 55 in patients with SPMS; the only reportedly positive sample was positive just at threshold level and was tested in a non-IgG-specific assay. In total, a single borderline positive result was observed among 290 tests.

conclusionOur data suggest that MOG-IgG is absent or extremely rare among patients with PPMS or SPMS. Routine screening of patients with typical PPMS/SPMS for MOG-IgG seems not to be justified.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesDatabases, BibliographicFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinTransfectionYoung AdultImmunoglobulin GMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinAntibodiesImmunoglobulin GMOG-IgGMyelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD)Primary chronic progressive MS (PPMS)Secondary chronic progressive MS (SPMS)

Identifiers

PMID29554927
PMCPMC5859439
OpenAlexW2795316771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.