Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554900›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2018

Tick- and fly-borne bacteria in ungulates: the prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, haemoplasmas and rickettsiae in water buffalo and deer species in Central Europe, Hungary.

Sándor Hornok, László Sugár, Isabel G Fernández de Mera, José de la Fuente, Gábor Horváth, Tibor Kovács, Attila Micsutka, Enikő Gönczi, Barbara Flaisz, Nóra Takács and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Wild mammals as hosts ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Review
  5. Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Review of Molecular Tools Used in Diagnosis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. First Description ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. First molecular detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Molecular Survey ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  20. Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sándor HornokDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary. Hornok.Sandor@univet.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-8615
László SugárDepartment of Game Management and Ethology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Isabel G Fernández de MeraSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
José de la FuenteSaBio. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Gábor HorváthVeterinary Authority, Csurgó, Hungary.
Tibor KovácsVeterinary Authority, Mórahalom, Hungary.
Attila MicsutkaFood Chain Safety and Veterinary Authority, Pásztó, Hungary.
Enikő GöncziClinical Laboratory and Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Barbara FlaiszDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Nóra TakácsDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Róbert FarkasDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Marina L MeliClinical Laboratory and Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Regina Hofmann-LehmannClinical Laboratory and Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Veterinary Medicine · HUUniversity of Zurich · CHInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESNational Food Chain Safety Office · HUOklahoma State University · USUniversity of Kaposvár · HU

Funding

FEKUTSTRAT 12190-4/2017OTKA 115854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHunting constitutes an important industry in Europe. However, data on the prevalence of vector-borne bacteria in large game animal species are lacking from several countries. Blood or spleen samples (239 and 270, respectively) were taken from red, fallow and roe deer, as well as from water buffaloes, mouflons and wild boars in Hungary, followed by DNA extraction and molecular analyses for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, haemoplasmas and rickettsiae.

resultsBased on blood samples, the prevalence rate of A. phagocytophilum infection was significantly higher in red deer (97.9%) than in fallow deer (72.7%) and roe deer (60%), and in all these compared to mouflons (6.3%). In addition, 39.2% of the spleen samples from wild boars were PCR positive for A. phagocytophilum, but none of the buffalos. Based on blood samples, the prevalence rates of both Mycoplasma wenyonii (Mw) and 'Candidatus M. haemobos' (CMh) infections were significantly higher in buffaloes (Mw: 91.2%; CMh: 73.3%) than in red deer (Mw: 64.6%; CMh: 45.8%), and in both of them compared to fallow deer (Mw: 30.3%; CMh: 9.1%) and roe deer (Mw: 20%; CMh: 1.5%). The prevalence of Mw and CMh infection significantly correlated with the body sizes of these hosts. Furthermore, Mw was significantly more prevalent than CMh in buffaloes, red and roe deer. Mycoplasma ovis was detected in mouflons, M. suis in wild boars, R. helvetica in one fallow deer and one mouflon, and an unidentified Rickettsia sp. in a fallow deer.

conclusionsForest-dwelling game animal species were found to be important carriers of A. phagocytophilum. In contrast, animals grazing grassland (i.e. buffaloes) were less likely to get infected with this Ixodes ricinus-borne pathogen. Water buffaloes, deer species, mouflons and wild boars harbored haemoplasmas that may affect domestic ungulates. Evaluated animals with larger body size had significantly higher prevalence of infection with haemoplasmas compared to smaller deer species. The above host species rarely carried rickettsiae.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumMycoplasmaRickettsiaceaeAnimalsAnimals, WildArachnid VectorsBuffaloesDeerDipteraEhrlichiosisHungaryInsect VectorsMaleMycoplasma InfectionsPrevalenceRickettsiaceae InfectionsAnaplasma phagocytophilum‘Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos’Mycoplasma suisMycoplasma wenyoniiRickettsia helvetica

Identifiers

PMID29554900
PMCPMC5859536
OpenAlexW2805423442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.