ArticleBMC ophthalmology2018
The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Catquest-9SF and Cat-PROM5 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Enhanced Monofocal IOLs Improve Patient Satisfaction in Phaco-Vitrectomy for ERM.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Analysis of visual quality improvement after implantation of PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens in cataract patients with different axial lengths.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada.PloS one · 2023Article
- Psychometric Evaluation of a Myanmar Version of the Perceived Stress Scale for People Living with HIV/AIDS.Journal of nursing measurement · 2022Article
- Catquest-9SF questionnaire shows greater visual functioning in bilateral cataract populations: A prospective study.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Visual quality analysis using the Chinese Catquest-9SF scale following different spherical aberration IOL implantation.Frontiers in public health · 2022Observational
- Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Adaptation and Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) in People Living with HIV in Myanmar.Mindfulness · 2022Article
- Adaptation and validation of a culturally adapted HIV stigma scale in Myanmar.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Validation and comparison of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and the Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) in patients with cataracts: a multicentre study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2021Article
- Translation, Adaption, and Psychometric Testing of the Myanmar Version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey for People Living With HIV/AIDS.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to validate the Chinese Catquest-9SF questionnaire in community screenings and explore the correlation between Catquest-9SF scores and Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III cataract grading.
methodsThis was a prospective questionnaire validation study. The Catquest-9SF questionnaire was translated into Chinese and was completed by 104 Chinese cataract patients who were diagnosed in community screening. Rasch analysis was used to assess its psychometric properties, and Spearman correlation coefficient was employed to determine the correlation between Catquest-9SF scores and LOCS III cataract grading.
resultsThe Catquest-9SF questionnaire demonstrated ordered response categories and unidimensionality (item fit statistics range: 0.70-1.35); the PSI and PR of the category probability curves were 2.00 and 0.80, respectively. There was a fair but statistically significant correlation between Catquest-9SF (Q6, Q7, and Q8) and LOCS III scores and a moderate correlation between Q4 in Catquest-9SF and subcapsular components for the better eye (r = - 0.546, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe Chinese version of Catquest-9SF is a valid and reliable questionnaire in community screenings. Thus, this questionnaire may be expected to be an auxiliary tool for preliminary cataract screening use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.