Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554876›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genetics2018

Clinical utility of exome sequencing in individuals with large homozygous regions detected by chromosomal microarray analysis.

Aparna Prasad, Matthew A Sdano, Rena J Vanzo, Patricia A Mowery-Rushton, Moises A Serrano, Charles H Hensel, E Robert Wassman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Variants of uncertain significance in prenatal microarrays: a retrospective cohort study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aparna PrasadLineagen, Inc., 2677 East Parleys Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109, USA. aprasad@lineagen.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-2313
Matthew A SdanoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Rena J VanzoLineagen, Inc., 2677 East Parleys Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109, USA.
Patricia A Mowery-RushtonLineagen, Inc., 2677 East Parleys Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109, USA.
Moises A SerranoLineagen, Inc., 2677 East Parleys Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109, USA.
Charles H HenselLineagen, Inc., 2677 East Parleys Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109, USA.
E Robert WassmanLineagen, Inc., 2677 East Parleys Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109, USA.
Lineage Cell Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is recommended as the first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities. In addition to detecting copy number variations, CMA platforms with single nucleotide polymorphism probes can detect large homozygous regions within the genome, which represent potential risk for recessively inherited disorders.

methodsTo determine the frequency in which pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants can be detected in these regions of homozygosity, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) in 53 individuals where homozygosity was detected by CMA. These patients were referred to our clinical laboratory for a variety of neurodevelopmental conditions including autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, epilepsy, intellectual disability and microcephaly.

resultsIn 11.3% (6/53) of cases, the analysis of homozygous variants revealed pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in GJB2, TPP1, SLC25A15, TYR, PCCB, and NDUFV2 which are implicated in a variety of diseases. The evaluation of heterozygous variants with autosomal dominant inheritance, compound heterozygotes and variants with X-linked inheritance revealed pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in PNPLA4, CADM1, HBB, SOS1, SFTPC, OTC and ASMT in 15.1% (8/53) of cases. Two of these patients harbored both homozygous and heterozygous variants relevant to their phenotypes (TPP1 and OTC; GJB2 and ASMT).

conclusionsOur study highlights the clinical utility of WES in individuals whose CMA uncovers homozygosity. Importantly, we show that when the phenotype is complex and homozygosity levels are high, WES can identify a significant number of relevant variants that explain neurodevelopmental phenotypes, and these mutations may lie outside of the regions of homozygosity, suggesting that the appropriate follow up test is WES rather than targeted sequencing.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingAdolescentAmino Acid Transport Systems, BasicAminopeptidasesAutism Spectrum DisorderChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHomozygoteHumansInfantAmino Acid Transport Systems, BasicAminopeptidasesDipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesKCNAB2 protein, humanMitochondrial Membrane Transport ProteinsNADH DehydrogenaseNDUFV2 protein, humanPotassium Channels, Voltage-GatedSerine ProteasesShaker Superfamily of Potassium ChannelsSLC25A15 protein, humanTPP1 protein, humanTripeptidyl-Peptidase 1Absence of heterozygosityClinical utility of genetic testingConsanguineousConsanguinityDiagnosticsExome sequencingHomozygosityLong contiguous stretches of homozygosityNeurodevelopmental disordersPathogenic variantsRuns of homozygosity

Identifiers

PMID29554876
PMCPMC5859484
OpenAlexW2792798666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.