Trial reportNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2018
Accelerating Stroke Recovery: Body Structures and Functions, Activities, Participation, and Quality of Life Outcomes From a Large Rehabilitation Trial.
Trial report in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00871715 (Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehab Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehab Evaluation (ICARE) Stroke Initiative
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Integrated care management for patients following acute stroke: a systematic review.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Intense Arm Rehabilitation Therapy Improves the Modified Rankin Scale Score: Association Between Gains in Impairment and Function.Neurology · 2021Trial
- Gains Across WHO Dimensions of Function After Robot-Based Therapy in Stroke Subjects.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2020Trial
- Dosage Matters.Stroke · 2019Trial
- How deep is your recovery? Rethinking true motor recovery versus compensation in neurorehabilitation.International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation · 2026Review
- Neurorehabilitation needs a qualitative perspective: a case exemplar from stroke recovery and rehabilitation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Physiotherapists' knowledge, attitude and practice of motor learning in stroke rehabilitation.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2026Article
- Predictive utility of self-efficacy in early stroke rehabilitation.Topics in stroke rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-BIG for Neurological Diseases Other than Parkinson's Disease: Mini Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Psychological Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction Post-stroke: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- The Perspectives of Individuals with Chronic Stroke on Motor Recovery: A Qualitative Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Postoperative rehabilitation and quality of life evaluation for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Developmental trajectory of care dependency in older stroke patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Autonomy support encourages use of more-affected arm post-stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Reversed Mirror Therapy (REMIT) after Stroke-A Proof-of-Concept Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- A predictive model for social participation of middle-aged and older adult stroke survivors: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Validity of the telematic Fugl Meyer assessment scale - upper extremity (TFMA-UE) Spanish version.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTask-oriented therapies have been developed to address significant upper extremity disability that persists after stroke. Yet, the extent of and approach to rehabilitation and recovery remains unsatisfactory to many.
objectiveTo compare a skill-directed investigational intervention with usual care treatment for body functions and structures, activities, participation, and quality of life outcomes.
methodsOn average, 46 days poststroke, 361 patients were randomized to 1 of 3 outpatient therapy groups: a patient-centered Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program (ASAP), dose-equivalent usual occupational therapy (DEUCC), or usual therapy (UCC). Outcomes were taken at baseline, posttreatment, 6 months, and 1 year after randomization. Longitudinal mixed effect models compared group differences in poststroke improvement during treatment and follow-up phases.
resultsAcross all groups, most improvement occurred during the treatment phase, followed by change more slowly during follow-up. Compared with DEUCC and UCC, ASAP group gains were greater during treatment for Stroke Impact Scale Hand, Strength, Mobility, Physical Function, and Participation scores, self-efficacy, perceived health, reintegration, patient-centeredness, and quality of life outcomes. ASAP participants reported higher Motor Activity Log-28 Quality of Movement than UCC posttreatment and perceived greater study-related improvements in quality of life. By end of study, all groups reached similar levels with only limited group differences.
conclusionsCustomized task-oriented training can be implemented to accelerate gains across a full spectrum of patient-reported outcomes. While group differences for most outcomes disappeared at 1 year, ASAP participants achieved these outcomes on average 8 months earlier (ClinicalTrials.gov: Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation [ICARE] Stroke Initiative, at www.ClinicalTrials.gov/ClinicalTrials.gov . Identifier: NCT00871715).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.