Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554541›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2018

Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence.

Muriel T N Panouillères, Rowan Boyles, Jennifer Chesters, Kate E Watkins, Riikka Möttönen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Left motor cortex contributes to auditory phonological discrimination.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What Happened to Mirror Neurons?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muriel T N PanouillèresDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: muriel.panouilleres@inserm.fr.
Rowan BoylesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rowan.boyles@nhs.net.
Jennifer ChestersDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jennifer.chesters@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Kate E WatkinsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kate.watkins@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Riikka MöttönenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Riikka.Mottonen@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000566Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT091070AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehending speech can be particularly challenging in a noisy environment and in the absence of semantic context. It has been proposed that the articulatory motor system would be recruited especially in difficult listening conditions. However, it remains unknown how signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and semantic context affect the recruitment of the articulatory motor system when listening to continuous speech. The aim of the present study was to address the hypothesis that involvement of the articulatory motor cortex increases when the intelligibility and clarity of the spoken sentences decreases, because of noise and the lack of semantic context. We applied Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to the lip and hand representations in the primary motor cortex and measured motor evoked potentials from the lip and hand muscles, respectively, to evaluate motor excitability when young adults listened to sentences. In Experiment 1, we found that the excitability of the lip motor cortex was facilitated during listening to both semantically anomalous and coherent sentences in noise relative to non-speech baselines, but neither SNR nor semantic context modulated the facilitation. In Experiment 2, we replicated these findings and found no difference in the excitability of the lip motor cortex between sentences in noise and clear sentences without noise. Thus, our results show that the articulatory motor cortex is involved in speech processing even in optimal and ecologically valid listening conditions and that its involvement is not modulated by the intelligibility and clarity of speech.

Indexed as

AdultComprehensionElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalSpeechSpeech PerceptionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultArticulatory motor cortexSemantic contextSpeech in noiseSpeech perceptionTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29554541
PMCPMC6002609
OpenAlexW2738683683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.