Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554465›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2018

The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update.

Sandra J Lee, Xiaoxue Li, Hui Huang, Marvin Zelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Population simulation modeling of disparities in US breast cancer mortality.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cancer screening simulation models: a state of the art review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer Modeling.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra J LeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Xiaoxue LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Hui HuangDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Marvin ZelenDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice and PolicyU01CA199218 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2015 to 2019
$9.0M
Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice & PolicyU01CA152958 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2010 to 2015
$7.6M
Vermont Screening Process Documentation UnitU54CA163303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPRAGUE, BRIAN L · 2011 to 2017
$6.4M
Analytical Investigation of Breast Cancer Progression: DCIS, OverdiagnosisR01CA164301 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI LEE, SANDRA J · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164301NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152958NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199218NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe present updated features to a model developed by Dana-Farber investigators within the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). The initial model was developed to evaluate the impact of mammography screening strategies.

methodsThis major update includes the incorporation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as part of the natural history of breast cancer. The updated model allows DCIS in the pre-clinical state to regress to undetectable early-stage DCIS, or to transition to invasive breast cancer, or to clinical DCIS. We summarize model assumptions for DCIS natural history and model parameters. Another new development is the derivation of analytical expressions for overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis refers to mammographic identification of breast cancer that would never have resulted in disease symptoms in the patient's remaining lifetime (i.e., lead time longer than residual survival time). This is an inevitable consequence of early detection. Our model uniquely assesses overdiagnosis using an analytical formulation. We derive the lead time distribution resulting from the early detection of invasive breast cancer and DCIS, and formulate the analytical expression for overdiagnosis.

resultsThis formulation was applied to assess overdiagnosis from mammography screening. Other model updates involve implementing common model input parameters with updated treatment dissemination and effectiveness, and improved mammography performance. Lastly, the model was expanded to incorporate subgroups by breast density and molecular subtypes.

conclusionsThe incorporation of DCIS and subgroups and the derivation of an overdiagnosis estimation procedure improve the model for evaluating mammography screening programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast DensityComputer SimulationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMassachusettsMedical OveruseMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRisk Assessmentductal carcinoma in situlead timemammography screeningoverdiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID29554465
PMCPMC5929104
OpenAlexW2791280376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.