ArticleJAMA internal medicine2018
Medicare Accountable Care Organization Enrollment and Appropriateness of Cancer Screening.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Pathways to Success Launch With Quality inBeneficiaries With Traditional Medicare.Health services research · 2026Article
- Advancing the Field of Deimplementation: Perspectives on Low-Value Clinical Preventive Services.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Investigating the racial gap in prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen among younger men from 2012 to 2020.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- The impact of Medicare shared savings program participation on hospital financial performance: An event-study analysis.Health services research · 2023Article
- Primary care physicians' participation in the Medicare shared savings program and preventive services delivery: Evidence from the first 7 years.Health services research · 2022Article
- Strategies to Reduce Low-Value Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2022Review
- Spending outcomes among patients with cancer in accountable care organizations 4 years after implementation.Cancer · 2022Article
- Taking account of accountable care.Health services research · 2021Article
- Article
- Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Spending on Surgery.American journal of accountable care · 2020Article
- Geographic Variation in Overscreening for Colorectal, Cervical, and Breast Cancer Among Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Trends in the Cost of Cancer Care: Beyond Drugs.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Review
- How Do Accountable Care Organizations Deliver Preventive Care Services? A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- What Can Canada Learn From Accountable Care Organizations: A Comparative Policy Analysis.International journal of integrated careArticle
- The Effect of Network-Level Payment Models on Care Network Performance: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Literature.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Despite rapid diffusion of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), whether ACO enrollment results in observable changes in cancer screening remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACO enrollment changes the appropriateness of screening for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this population-based analysis of Medicare beneficiaries, we used Medicare data from 2007 through 2014 and evaluated changes in screening associated with ACO enrollment using differences-in-differences (DD) analyses. We then performed difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) analyses to determine whether observed changes in cancer screening associated with ACO enrollment were different across strata of appropriateness, defined using age (65-74 years vs ≥75 years) and predicted survival (top vs bottom quartile). Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening measured yearly as a proportion of eligible Medicare beneficiaries undergoing relevant screening services. Results: Among Medicare beneficiaries, comprising 39 218 652 person-years before MSSP enrollment and 17 252 345 person-years after MSSP enrollment, breast cancer screening declined among both ACO (42.7% precontract, 38.1% postcontract) and non-ACO (37.3% precontract, 34.1% postcontract) populations. The adjusted rate of decline (DD) in the ACO population exceeded the non-ACO population by 0.79% (P < .001). This decline was most pronounced among elderly women (-2.1%), with minimal observed change among younger women (-0.26%). Baseline colorectal cancer screening rates were lower than those for breast cancer among both ACO (10.1% precontract, 10.3% postcontract) and non-ACO (9.2% precontract, 9.1% postcontract) populations. We observed an adjusted 0.24% (P = .03) increase in screening associated with ACO enrollment, most pronounced among younger Medicare beneficiaries (0.36%). For breast and colorectal cancer, we observed statistically significant differences in estimates of effect between age strata, suggesting that the ACO effect on cancer screening is mediated by age (DDD for both P < .001). Prostate cancer screening declined among ACO (35.1% precontract, 28.5% postcontract) and non-ACO (31.2% precontract, 25.7% postcontract) populations. The adjusted rate of decline in the ACO population exceeded that of the non-ACO population by 1.2%. We observed no difference in estimate of effect between age strata, suggesting that the ACO-mediated changes in prostate cancer screening are similar among younger and elderly men. Results characterizing appropriateness with predicted survival mirrored those when stratified by age. Conclusions and Relevance: Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO enrollment is associated with more appropriate breast and colorectal screening, although the magnitude of the observed ACO effect is modest in the early ACO experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.