Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554174›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2018

Association of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists With Asthma Control in Patients With Uncontrolled, Persistent Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Diana M Sobieraj, William L Baker, Elaine Nguyen, Erin R Weeda, Craig I Coleman, C Michael White, Stephen C Lazarus, Kathryn V Blake, Jason E Lang

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05292586 (A 12 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Active Controlled, 2-Arm Parallel Group Study Testing the Superiority of CHF 1535 pMDI 800/24µg Total Daily Dose), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05292586 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A 12 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Active Controlled, 2-Arm Parallel Group Study Testing the Superiority of CHF 1535 pMDI 800/24µg Total Daily Dose (Fixed Combination of Extrafine Beclomethasone Dipropionate Plus Formoterol Fumarate) Compared to CHF 718 pMDI 800µg Total Daily Dose (Extrafine Beclomethasone Dipropionate) in Adults With Asthma on Medium or High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid

TypeinterventionalSponsorChiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled1,377ConditionsAsthmaArmsBeclomethasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate, Beclomethasone Dipropionate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The new era of add-on asthma treatments: where do we stand?Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Review
  16. Bronchoscopic Targeted Lung Denervation in Patients with Severe Asthma: Preliminary Findings.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: Executive Summary and Rationale for Key Changes.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diana M SobierajDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs.
William L BakerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs.
Elaine NguyenDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs.
Erin R WeedaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs.
Craig I ColemanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs.
C Michael WhiteDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs.
Stephen C LazarusDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Kathryn V BlakeCenter for Pharmacogenomics and Translational Research, Nemours Children's Specialty Care, Jacksonville, Florida.
Jason E LangDivision of Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Children's Hospital and Health Center, Durham, North Carolina.
University of Connecticut · USDuke University · USNemours Children's Health System · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a potential adjunct therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of persistent asthma. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects associated with LAMA vs placebo or vs other controllers as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and the use of a LAMA as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists (LABAs; hereafter referred to as triple therapy) vs inhaled corticosteroids and LABA in patients with uncontrolled, persistent asthma. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and clinical trial registries (earliest date through November 28, 2017). Study Selection: Two reviewers selected randomized clinical trials or observational studies evaluating a LAMA vs placebo or vs another controller as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids or triple therapy vs inhaled corticosteroids and LABA in patients with uncontrolled, persistent asthma reporting on an outcome of interest. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Meta-analyses using a random-effects model was conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs), risk differences (RDs), and mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Citation screening, data abstraction, risk assessment, and strength-of-evidence grading were completed by 2 independent reviewers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Asthma exacerbations. Results: Of 1326 records identified, 15 randomized clinical trials (N = 7122 patients) were included. Most trials assessed adding LAMA vs placebo or LAMA vs LABA to inhaled corticosteroids. Adding LAMA vs placebo to inhaled corticosteroids was associated with a significantly reduced risk of exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92]; RD, -0.02 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.00]). Compared with adding LABA, adding LAMA to inhaled corticosteroids was not associated with significant improvements in exacerbation risk (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.42]; RD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.02]), or any other outcomes of interest. Triple therapy was not significantly associated with improved exacerbation risk vs inhaled corticosteroids and LABA (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.22]; RD, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.08 to 0.07]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of LAMA compared with placebo as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids was associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbations; however, the association of LAMA with benefit may not be greater than that with LABA. Triple therapy was not associated with a lower risk of exacerbations.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBiasDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMuscarinic AntagonistsRespiratory Function TestsRisk AssessmentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsMuscarinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID29554174
PMCPMC5876909
OpenAlexW2791858057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.