Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554149›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A mouse model for evaluation of efficacy and concomitant toxicity of anti-human CXCR4 therapeutics.

Maria José Costa, Jyothirmayee Kudaravalli, Wen-Hui Liu, Jeffrey Stock, Sophanna Kong, Shu-Hui Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. αPharmacological research · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Hematopoietic Bone Marrow Niche Ecosystem.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Targeting CXCR4 in AML and ALL.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria José CostaCancer Immunology Discovery, Oncology Research and Development, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6111-7614
Jyothirmayee KudaravalliCancer Immunology Discovery, Oncology Research and Development, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Wen-Hui LiuCancer Immunology Discovery, Oncology Research and Development, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jeffrey StockDiscovery Sciences, Medicinal Sciences, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, United States of America.
Sophanna KongCancer Immunology Discovery, Oncology Research and Development, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Shu-Hui LiuCancer Immunology Discovery, Oncology Research and Development, Worldwide Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies through mouse immunization often originates drug candidates that are not cross-reactive to the mouse ortholog. In such cases, and particularly in oncology, drug efficacy studies are performed on human tumor xenografts or with "surrogate" anti-mouse ortholog antibodies if targeting tumor host cells. Safety assessment of drug candidate(s) is performed at a later development stage in healthy non-human primates. While the latter remains necessary before a drug advances into human subjects, it precludes evaluation of safety in disease conditions and drug de-risking during early development. Therefore, mouse models that allow concomitant evaluation of drug efficacy and safety are highly desirable. The C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is an attractive target for tumor-targeted and immuno-oncology therapeutics, with multiple mouse immunization-derived antibodies undergoing clinical trials. Given the pleiotropic role of CXCR4 in cancer biology, we anticipate continuous interest in this target, particularly in the testing of therapeutic combinations for immuno-oncology. Here, we describe the generation and validation of the first mouse knock-in of the whole coding region of human CXCR4. Homozygous human CXCR4 knock-in (hereafter designated as HuCXCR4KI) mice were viable and outwardly healthy, reproduced normally and nursed their young. The expression pattern of human CXCR4 in this model was similar to that of CXCR4 expression in normal human tissues. The human CXCR4 knock-in gene was expressed as a biologically active protein, thereby allowing normal animal development and adequate"homing" of leukocytes to the bone marrow. To further validate our model, we used an in vivo functional assay of leukocyte mobilization from bone marrow to peripheral blood by blocking CXCR4 signaling. Both an anti-human CXCR4 -specific blocking antibody and the small molecule CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100 induced increased leukocyte counts in peripheral blood, whereas an anti-mouse CXCR4 -specific blocking antibody had no effect. This new mouse model is useful to evaluate efficacy and safety of anti-human CXCR4 -specific drugs as single agents or in combination therapies, particularly in the oncology, immuno-oncology, wound healing and chronic inflammation therapeutic areas.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCancer VaccinesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleGene Knock-In TechniquesHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMolecular Targeted TherapyAntibodies, MonoclonalCancer VaccinesCXCR4 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID29554149
PMCPMC5858835
OpenAlexW2792070967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.