Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29554056›Full record

Observational studyTransplantation2018

Comparing Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Strategies: A Modified Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Xingxing S Cheng, W Ray Kim, Jane C Tan, Glenn M Chertow, Jeremy Goldhaber-Fiebert

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation versus Liver Transplantation in End-Stage Liver Disease Patients with Kidney Dysfunction.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2026
    Article
  2. Optimal patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplant: A modified cost-effectiveness analysis.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  3. Poor Outcomes of Patients With NAFLD and Moderate Renal Dysfunction or Short-Term Dialysis Receiving a Liver Transplant Alone.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Simultaneous liver kidney allocation policy and the Safety Net: an early examination of utilization and outcomes in the United States.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xingxing S ChengDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
W Ray KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
Jane C TanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
Glenn M ChertowDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
Jeremy Goldhaber-FiebertCenter of Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Funding

Mentoring Patient-Oriented Clinical Investigators in NephrologyK24DK085446 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERTOW, GLENN MATTHEW · 2010 to 2022
$1.4M
Patient-oriented and effectiveness research in chronic liver diseaseK24DK092336 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, W. RAY · 2012 to 2016
$627k
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK085446NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK092336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proportion of patients with kidney failure at time of liver transplantation is at a historic high in the United States. The optimal timing of kidney transplantation with respect to the liver transplant is unknown.

methodsWe used a modified cost-effectiveness analysis to compare 4 strategies: the old system ("pre-OPTN"), the new Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) system since August 10, 2017 ("OPTN"), and 2 strategies which restrict simultaneous liver-kidney transplants ("safety net" and "stringent"). We measured "cost" by deployment of deceased donor kidneys (DDKs) to liver transplant recipients and effectiveness by life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in liver transplant recipients. We validated our model against Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients data.

resultsThe OPTN, safety net and stringent strategies were on the efficiency frontier. By rank order, OPTN > safety net > stringent strategy in terms of LY, QALY, and DDK deployment. The pre-OPTN system was dominated, or outperformed, by all alternative strategies. The incremental LY per DDK between the strategies ranged from 1.30 to 1.85. The incremental QALY per DDK ranged from 1.11 to 2.03.

conclusionsThese estimates quantify the "organ"-effectiveness of various kidney allocation strategies for liver transplant candidates. The OPTN system will likely deliver better liver transplant outcomes at the expense of more frequent deployment of DDKs to liver transplant recipients.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansKidney TransplantationLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedProcess Assessment, Health CareQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRisk FactorsTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentTissue and Organ ProcurementTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29554056
PMCPMC7946326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.