ArticleEar and hearing
Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A cascading effects model of early sensory development in autism.Psychological review · 2026Review
- Establishing New Pediatric Thresholds for Digits-In-Noise Testing.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Development of the binaural intelligibility level difference for speech-in-speech recognition.JASA express letters · 2025Article
- The Long-Term Effect of Childhood Otitis Media on Speech-in-Noise Testing at Ages 9 and 13.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Genotype and Phenotype Analyses of a NovelGenes · 2023Article
- A pilot study on spatial hearing in children with congenital unilateral aural atresia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Speech-in-noise testing: Innovative applications for pediatric patients, underrepresented populations, fitness for duty, clinical trials, and remote services.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Review
- Article
- Audiological Performance of ADHEAR Systems in Simulated Conductive Hearing Loss: A Case Series with a Review of the Existing Literature.Audiology research · 2021Article
- Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian.International journal of audiology · 2021Article
- French Version of the Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise Test for Smartphone Hearing Screening.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Feasibility of remote assessment of the binaural intelligibility level difference in school-age children.JASA express letters · 2021Article
- Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Speech Perception in Classroom Acoustics by Children With Hearing Loss and Wearing Hearing Aids.American journal of audiology · 2020Article
- Association of Slight to Mild Hearing Loss With Behavioral Problems and School Performance in Children.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2020Article
- Assessment of noise pollution and its effects on human health in industrial hub of Pakistan.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- A Smartphone National Hearing Test: Performance and Characteristics of Users.American journal of audiology · 2018Article
- Masked Speech Recognition by Normal-Hearing 6-13-Year-Olds in Conditions With and Without Interaural Difference Cues.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe main purpose of this study was to examine developmental effects for speech recognition in noise abilities for normal-hearing children in several listening conditions, relevant for daily life. Our aim was to study the auditory component in these listening abilities by using a test that was designed to minimize the dependency on nonauditory factors, the digits-in-noise (DIN) test. Secondary aims were to examine the feasibility of the DIN test for children, and to establish age-dependent normative data for diotic and dichotic listening conditions in both stationary and interrupted noise.
designIn experiment 1, a newly designed pediatric DIN (pDIN) test was compared with the standard DIN test. Major differences with the DIN test are that the pDIN test uses 79% correct instead of 50% correct as a target point, single digits (except 0) instead of triplets, and animations in the test procedure. In this experiment, 43 normal-hearing subjects between 4 and 12 years of age and 10 adult subjects participated. The authors measured the monaural speech reception threshold for both DIN test and pDIN test using headphones. Experiment 2 used the standard DIN test to measure speech reception thresholds in noise in 112 normal-hearing children between 4 and 12 years of age and 33 adults. The DIN test was applied using headphones in stationary and interrupted noise, and in diotic and dichotic conditions, to study also binaural unmasking and the benefit of listening in the gaps.
resultsMost children could reliably do both pDIN test and DIN test, and measurement errors for the pDIN test were comparable between children and adults. There was no significant difference between the score for the pDIN test and that of the DIN test. Speech recognition scores increase with age for all conditions tested, and performance is adult-like by 10 to 12 years of age in stationary noise but not interrupted noise. The youngest, 4-year-old children have speech reception thresholds 3 to 7 dB less favorable than adults, depending on test conditions. The authors found significant age effects on binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit, even after correction for the lower baseline speech reception threshold of adults in stationary noise.
conclusionsSpeech recognition in noise abilities develop well into adolescence, and young children need a more favorable signal-to-noise ratio than adults for all listening conditions. Speech recognition abilities in children in stationary and interrupted noise can accurately and reliably be tested using the DIN test. A pediatric version of the test was shown to be unnecessary. Normative data were established for the DIN test in stationary and fluctuating maskers, and in diotic and dichotic conditions. The DIN test can thus be used to test speech recognition abilities for normal-hearing children from the age of 4 years and older.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.