Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29553968›Full record

ArticleApplied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM2019

Fresh Cut Versus Stored Cut Paraffin-embedded Tissue: Effect on Immunohistochemical Staining for Common Breast Cancer Markers.

Catherine L Forse, Dushanthi Pinnaduwage, Shelley B Bull, Anna Marie Mulligan, Irene L Andrulis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. HER2-low breast cancer: insights on pathological testing.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Impact of Preanalytical Factors on the Measurement of Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Using Immunohistochemistry.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine L ForseDepartments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology.
Dushanthi PinnaduwageLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute.
Shelley B BullLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute.
Anna Marie MulliganDepartments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology.
Irene L AndrulisDepartments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology.

Funding

Core-001U01CA164920 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Irene Andrulis, Sarah Violet Colonna · 2018 to 2026
$17.0M
Breast Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA164920 · NCI · CANCER PREVENTION INSTIT OF CALIFORNIA · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE, BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 2012 to 2017
$12.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164920NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper handling of unstained paraffin slides for immunohistochemistry has been a matter of debate, with several studies demonstrating loss of antigenicity with prolonged storage at room temperature, 4°C and -20°C. The purpose of this study was to determine whether long-term storage of unstained slides at -80°C would impact the staining intensity and expression distribution of markers used to molecularly subtype breast cancer specimens [estrogen receptor (ER), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), cytokeratin 5 (CK5), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and Ki67]. The staining pattern of previously unstained breast tumor slides (n=39 to 64) stored at -80°C for a minimum of 9.93 years (avg., 12.8 y) was compared with the staining pattern of fresh cut slides from the same tumors. The Allred scoring method was used to score ER (0 to 2, negative; 3 to 8, positive), CK5 (≥4, positive), and EGFR (≥4, positive). ASCO/CAP guidelines were used to assess HER2 (0/1+, 2+, or 3+). Ki67 scores were determined based on the proportion of cells stained of any intensity, with 20% staining used as a cut-off. Agreement was assessed using concordance rates and chance-corrected agreement statistics. The chance-corrected agreements were as follows: 0.94 (38/39) for ER, 0.92 (53/55) for CK5, 0.87 (61/64) for EGFR, 0.86 (37/39) for HER2, and 0.67 (46/54) for Ki67. Long-term storage of cut unstained slides at -80°C does not significantly impact the scoring interpretation of ER, CK5, EGFR, and HER2.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsParaffin EmbeddingStaining and LabelingBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29553968
PMCPMC6141355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.