Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29553912›Full record

ReviewJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews2018

In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: relevant to human health risk assessment.

Karen D Bradham, Gary L Diamond, Michele Burgess, Albert Juhasz, Julie M Klotzbach, Mark Maddaloni, Clay Nelson, Kirk Scheckel, Sophia M Serda, Marc Stifelman and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Development of a whole-cell biosensor based on an ArsR-PEnvironmental science and ecotechnology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Arsenic Accumulation of Realgar Altered by Disruption of Gut Microbiota in Mice.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen D Bradhama Public Health Chemistry Branch, Exposure Methods and Measurements Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory , Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.
Gary L Diamondb SRC Inc ., North Syracuse , NY , USA.
Michele Burgessc Science Policy Branch, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Office of Land and Emergency Management , US Environmental Protection Agency , Arlington , VA , USA.
Albert Juhaszd Future Industries Institute , University of South Australia , Adelaide , SA , Australia.
Julie M Klotzbachb SRC Inc ., North Syracuse , NY , USA.
Mark Maddalonie Region 2 , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , New York , NY , USA.
Clay Nelsona Public Health Chemistry Branch, Exposure Methods and Measurements Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory , Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.
Kirk Scheckelf Land Remediation and Pollution Control Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory , Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Cincinnati , Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-9326-9241
Sophia M Serdag Region 9 , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , San Francisco , CA , USA.
Marc Stifelmanh Region 10 , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Seattle , WA , USA.
David J Thomasi Pharmacokinetics Branch, Integrated Systems Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory , Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arsenic (As) is the most frequently occurring contaminant on the priority list of hazardous substances, which lists substances of greatest public health concern to people living at or near U.S. National Priorities List site. Accurate assessment of human health risks from exposure to As-contaminated soils depends on estimating its bioavailability, defined as the fraction of ingested As absorbed across the gastrointestinal barrier and available for systemic distribution and metabolism. Arsenic bioavailability varies among soils and is influenced by site-specific soil physical and chemical characteristics and internal biological factors. This review describes the state-of-the science that supports our understanding of oral bioavailability of soil As, the methods that are currently being explored for estimating soil As relative bioavailability (RBA), and future research areas that could improve our prediction of the oral RBA of soil As in humans. The following topics are addressed: (1) As soil geochemistry; (2) As toxicology; (3) in vivo models for estimating As RBA; (4) in vitro bioaccessibility methods; and (5) conclusions and research needs.

Indexed as

ArsenicBiological AvailabilityHumansIn Vitro TechniquesRisk AssessmentSoilSoil PollutantsArsenicSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID29553912
PMCPMC9347188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.