Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29553776›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2018

Differential effects of predictable vs. unpredictable aversive experience early in development on fear memory and learning in adulthood.

Rheall F Roquet, Dong-Oh Seo, Carolyn E Jones, Marie-H Monfils

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rheall F RoquetDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Dong-Oh SeoDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Carolyn E JonesDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Marie-H MonfilsDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Fear memory attenuation: testing reconsolidation-extinction boundariesR01MH091147 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MONFILS, MARIE H. · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the enduring effects of predictable versus unpredictable fear conditioning early in life on memory and relearning in adulthood. At postnatal Day 17 or 25 (P17 or P25), rats either remained naïve, or were fear conditioned using paired (predictable) or unpaired (unpredictable) presentations of white noise and foot shocks. At 2 months of age (adulthood), each group was fear conditioned (or reconditioned) with either paired or unpaired training, and then was tested for fear extinction the next day. Initial findings replicate previous work from our lab and others, demonstrating a difference in adult memory retention based on age of acquisition. Specifically, rats that received paired conditioning at P25, but not P17, show increased freezing to the cue when tested in adulthood. We further show that paired as well as unpaired conditioning at P17 potentiates paired conditioning in adulthood; however, paired, but not unpaired, conditioning at P25 potentiates paired and unpaired conditioning in adulthood. These findings suggest that early predictable versus unpredictable aversive learning at P17 or P25 differentially modulate memory retention and future learning. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

AgingConditioning, ClassicalFearMemoryAnimalsAvoidance LearningElectroshockExtinction, PsychologicalFreezing Reaction, CatalepticMaleMasochismRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID29553776
PMCPMC11613705
OpenAlexW2793837758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.