Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29553775›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2018

Rapid forgetting of social learning in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome: New evidence for hippocampal dysfunction.

Brian E Powers, Nicholas A Santiago, Barbara J Strupp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian E PowersDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University.
Nicholas A SantiagoDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University.
Barbara J StruppDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Perinatal choline therapy in a mouse model of Down Syndrome & Alzheimer's DiseaseR01HD057564 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI STRUPP, BARBARA J · 2008 to 2012
$2.9M
National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome recapitulates the hallmark areas of dysfunction that characterize the human disorder, including impaired performance in tasks designed to tap hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. Unfortunately, performance in the water maze tasks most commonly used for this purpose can be affected by behavioral and/or physiological abnormalities characteristic of Ts65Dn mice (e.g., thigmotaxis, susceptibility to hypothermia, stress reactivity), which complicates interpretation of impaired performance. The current study assessed hippocampal function in Ts65Dn mice using the social transmission of food preference (STFP) paradigm, which does not entail water escape or aversive reinforcement, and thus avoids these interpretive confounds. We tested Ts65Dn mice and disomic controls on this task using 1- and 7-day retention intervals. The Ts65Dn mice exhibited normal learning and memory following the 1-day retention interval, but rapid forgetting of the socially acquired information, evidenced by impaired performance following the 7-day retention interval. The STFP paradigm can be a valuable tool for studies using the Ts65Dn mouse model to evaluate potential therapies that may ameliorate hippocampal dysfunction and aging-related cognitive decline in Down syndrome. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

MemoryMemory DisordersSocial LearningAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDown SyndromeFeeding BehaviorFemaleHippocampusMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicTaste Perception

Identifiers

PMID29553775
PMCPMC5938627
OpenAlexW2789767315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.