Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29553763›Full record

SynthesisPsychological bulletin2018

Can't get it out of my mind: A systematic review of predictors of intrusive memories of distressing events.

Elizabeth H Marks, Anna R Franklin, Lori A Zoellner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From Screens to Scars: Understanding the Association Between Social Media Engagement and Trauma During Crises and Emergency Situations.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Going Beyond Explicit Memories: Future Steps and Considerations in the Research of Symptom-Relevant Negative Autobiographical Memories in Anxiety Related Disorders.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth H MarksDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington.
Anna R FranklinDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington.
Lori A ZoellnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington.

Funding

Reducing Intrusions of Real-World Stimuli via Memory ReconsolidationF31MH106194 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARKS, ELIZABETH H. · 2014 to 2016
$125k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH106194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrusive memories, when persistent and distressing, are theorized to underlie a range of transdiagnostic psychological symptoms and associated impairment. However, little is known about factors predicting the development and persistence of intrusive memories. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the literature on pre-event, event-based, and post-event predictors of intrusive memories. A systematic review was conducted, searching for studies that examined intrusive, event-based memories. One hundred and six articles were identified from PsycInfo, PubMed, and Medline databases. Experimental and prospective studies with clinical (N = 14) and nonclinical (N = 92) samples were critically reviewed, provided the inclusion of an analogue stressor with nonclinical samples, and that intrusive memories frequency and/or distress were assessed as primary dependent variables. Pre-existing psychopathology and pre-event appraisal style appear to predict intrusive memories (small to medium effects), whereas trait dissociation did not predict intrusive memories. Of studies examining event-based predictors, higher data-driven processing appears to predict intrusive memories with generally large effects. Post-event negative appraisals consistently predicted intrusive memories (medium to large effects), and preliminary evidence suggests higher post-event conceptual processing predicting fewer intrusive memories. This review synthesizes findings regarding a broad range of pre-event, event-based, and post-event factors that may influence the development of intrusive memories. Methodological issues of current paradigms and the lack of emphasis on memory retrieval processes limit our understanding of what predicts intrusive memory persistence. These limitations are particularly important given that individuals typically seek treatment for distressing intrusive memories once a memory has been fully consolidated, where retrieval processes are of utmost importance. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyCognitionFemaleHumansMemoryMental RecallPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticStress, PsychologicalViolence

Identifiers

PMID29553763
PMCPMC5938103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.