Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29553762›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2018

A cognitive psychometric model for assessment of picture naming abilities in aphasia.

Grant M Walker, Gregory Hickok, Julius Fridriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing Relative Linguistic Impairment With Model-Based Item Selection.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  6. Defining aphasia: Content analysis of six aphasia diagnostic batteries.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Beyond Percent Correct: Measuring Change in Individual Picture Naming Ability.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
  12. Exploring the Complexity of Aphasia With Network Analysis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Article
  17. Multivariate Approaches to Understanding Aphasia and its Neural Substrates.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grant M WalkerDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
Gregory HickokDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina.
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Picture naming impairments are a typical feature of stroke-induced aphasia. Overall accuracy and rates of different error types are used to make inferences about the severity and nature of damage to the brain's language network. Currently available assessment tools for picture naming accuracy treat it as a unidimensional measure, while assessment tools for error types treat items homogenously, contrary to findings from psycholinguistic investigations of word production. We created and tested a new cognitive psychometric model for assessment of picture naming responses, using cognitive theory to specify latent processing decisions during the production of a naming attempt, and using item response theory to separate the effects of item difficulty and participant ability on these internal processing decisions. The model enables multidimensional assessment of latent picture naming abilities on a common scale, with a relatively large cohort for normative reference. We present the results of 4 experiments testing our interpretation of the model's parameters, as they apply to picture naming predictions, lexical properties of the items, statistical properties of the lexicon, and participants' scores on other tests. We also created a website for researchers and clinicians to analyze item-level data using our model, providing estimates of latent abilities and percentile scores, as well as credible intervals to help gauge the reliability of the estimated model parameters and identify meaningful changes. To the extent that the model is successful, the estimated parameter values may aid in treatment decisions and progress monitoring, or they may help elucidate the functional properties of brain networks. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

CognitionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnomiaAphasiaFemaleHumansLanguageLanguage TestsMaleMiddle AgedPsycholinguisticsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStroke

Identifiers

PMID29553762
PMCPMC5980659
OpenAlexW2791410881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.