Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29553575›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection.

Rekha Seshadri, Sinead C Leahy, Graeme T Attwood, Koon Hoong Teh, Suzanne C Lambie, Adrian L Cookson, Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh, Georgios A Pavlopoulos, Michalis Hadjithomas, Neha J Varghese and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 336 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
336citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

336 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

276 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Rekha SeshadriDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-2900
Sinead C LeahyAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-6738
Graeme T AttwoodAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Koon Hoong TehAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Suzanne C LambieAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Adrian L CooksonAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Emiley A Eloe-FadroshDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Georgios A PavlopoulosDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Michalis HadjithomasDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Neha J VargheseDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
David Paez-EspinoDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2939-5398
Hungate1000 project collaborators
Rechelle PerryAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Gemma HendersonAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Christopher J CreeveyInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Wales, UK.
Nicolas TerraponArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3693-6017
Pascal LapebieArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Elodie DrulaArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Vincent LombardArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Edward RubinDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Nikos C KyrpidesDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Bernard HenrissatArchitecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Tanja WoykeDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9485-5637
Natalia N IvanovaDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
William J KellyAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-066X

Funding

European Research Council 322820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Productivity of ruminant livestock depends on the rumen microbiota, which ferment indigestible plant polysaccharides into nutrients used for growth. Understanding the functions carried out by the rumen microbiota is important for reducing greenhouse gas production by ruminants and for developing biofuels from lignocellulose. We present 410 cultured bacteria and archaea, together with their reference genomes, representing every cultivated rumen-associated archaeal and bacterial family. We evaluate polysaccharide degradation, short-chain fatty acid production and methanogenesis pathways, and assign specific taxa to functions. A total of 336 organisms were present in available rumen metagenomic data sets, and 134 were present in human gut microbiome data sets. Comparison with the human microbiome revealed rumen-specific enrichment for genes encoding de novo synthesis of vitamin B

Indexed as

AnimalsArchaeaBacteriaBiofuelsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansLigninMicrobiotaRumenBiofuelsLigninlignocellulose

Identifiers

PMID29553575
PMCPMC6118326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.