ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2018
Cardiac pathophysiology in response to environmental stress: a current review.
Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guidelines for in vivo models of developmental programming of cardiovascular disease risk.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Review
- Understanding the Cardiovascular Fallout of E-cigarettes: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Cureus · 2024Review
- Ecological study of ambient air pollution exposure and mortality of cardiovascular diseases in elderly.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Cardiovascular Effects of Electronic Cigarettes.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Double trouble: combined cardiovascular effects of particulate matter exposure and coronavirus disease 2019.Cardiovascular research · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular adaptations to particle inhalation exposure: molecular mechanisms of the toxicology.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020Review
- Cardiovascular risk of electronic cigarettes: a review of preclinical and clinical studies.Cardiovascular research · 2020Review
- Exercise does not ameliorate cardiac dysfunction in obese mice exposed to fine particulate matter.Life sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEnvironmental stressors are disturbing our ecosystem at an accelerating rate. An increasingly relevant stressor are air pollutants, whose levels are increasing worldwide with threats to human health. These air pollutants are associated with increased mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular diseases. In this review we discuss environmental stressors focusing mainly on the various types of air pollutants, their short-term and long-term cardiovascular effects, and providing the epidemiological evidence associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Direct and indirect pathophysiological mechanisms are also linked with cardiovascular complications such as thrombosis, fibrinolysis, hypertension, ischemic heart diseases and arrhythmias.
resultsEvidence to date suggests that humans are constantly being exposed to unhealthy levels of environmental toxicants with the potential of serious health conditions. Environmental stressors adversely affect the cardiovascular system and pose an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases for those who reside in highly polluted areas.
conclusionPeople with existing risk factors and those with established cardiovascular disease have increased susceptibility to environmental stressors. The literature reviewed in this article thus support public health policies aimed at reducing pollutant exposure to benefit public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.