Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29552672›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in systems biology2018

Single-cell systems biology: probing the basic unit of information flow.

Simona Patange, Michelle Girvan, Daniel R Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in systems biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Omics Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: Literature Review and Perspectives in Transfusion Medicine.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  7. Quantifying information of intracellular signaling: progress with machine learning.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Spatial-omics: Novel approaches to probe cell heterogeneity and extracellular matrix biology.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The variome concept: focus on CNVariome.Molecular cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simona PatangeLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD 20892.
Michelle GirvanInstitute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Daniel R LarsonLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD 20892.

Funding

Transcription Dynamics in Single CellsZIABC011383 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LARSON, DANIEL · 2011 to 2025
$23.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression varies across cells in a population or a tissue. This heterogeneity has come into sharp focus in recent years through developments in new imaging and sequencing technologies. However, our ability to measure variation has outpaced our ability to interpret it. Much of the variability may arise from random effects occurring in the processes of gene expression (transcription, RNA processing and decay, translation). The molecular basis of these effects is largely unknown. Likewise, a functional role of this variability in growth, differentiation and disease has only been elucidated in a few cases. In this review, we highlight recent experimental and theoretical advances for measuring and analyzing stochastic variation.

Identifiers

PMID29552672
PMCPMC5851483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.